AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Iveta Toneryan

MATH240 · V1161 · MATH115 · MATH120 · MATH070 · MATH125 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and homework; struggling math students often report failing hard.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing math lecturesSoft voice fast paceHomework heavyStudy-guide dependentPatient when you ask
  • Reviews split hard between life-changing clarity and unintelligible fast lectures.
  • Tests are challenging and ; .
  • Attendance and note-taking matter because lectures move quickly and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Passing and , and self-study; several students report Fs and drops.

All evidence is in-person; no online comparison exists.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and many say the class only works if you already can keep up in math.

Difficulty comments are entirely from in-person math courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple skip-class tags and comments say missing lecture makes catching up nearly impossible.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About half love her clarity and care while a large .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Some report fair tests and rare EC or ; others say no EC and harsh outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of .

Format shift

Workload evidence is in-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Strong praise for , and disorganization complaints.

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and ; study guides appear but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call her the , speed, mismatched tests, and failed homework credit.

Main concern

Fast soft lectures and .

What students said

“she made math easy for me which never happened before.”
MATH125
“SOFT VOICE WHERE YOU CAN'T HEAR HER A LOT.”
MATH240
“I DID A FULL SEMESTER OF HOMEWORK AND SHE DID NOT GIVE ME CREDIT.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or study-guide help, but reviews often feel different from the .

Challenging testsOccasional cheat sheetStudy guidesTest reviews may mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as challenging; one class allowed a cheat sheet, and study guides or day-before reviews are common but sometimes mismatched.

Challenging examsCheat sheet allowed sometimesStudy guidesDay-before review
“ but she allowed us to have a cheat sheet.”
MATH240
“ test.”
MATH240
“THE MATH PROBLEMS ON THE STUDY GUIDE DIDN'T .”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless if you are a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization between fans and struggling students. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

54/100

“She is amazing, she is .”

📉 Hard Fail Risk

34/100

“If you struggle in math you will not pass her class.”

🔊 Delivery Issues

40/100

“SOFT VOICE WHERE YOU CAN'T HEAR HER A LOT.”

👍 Loyal Fans

70/100

“I can say just one thing she is the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the has a gift.
  • Lecture so fast.
  • she is no nonsense, straight to the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • SHE'S A BAD TEACHER.
  • auto C if you get 70% or

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of .
  • Pay attention to class notes and you should be solid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

30 reviews with detailed but highly polarized opinions and some same-day negative clusters reduce full confidence.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH11517 reviews
MATH1257 reviews
MATH2403 reviews
MATH0701 review
MATH1201 review
Show 1 more courses
V11611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3