AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Elizabeth Friedman

CHEM1161 · CHEM3062 · CHEM51 · CHEM68 · CHEMISTR · CHEM1717 · CHEM051 · CHEM101 · CHEMI1161 · CHEM1177 · CHEM102 · 97 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you already love chemistry and can study many hours weekly; otherwise pick another instructor to protect your GPA.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTrick TestsHigh Drop RateKnows ChemistryPolarizing
  • Many students report , and GPA damage.
  • A minority still praise her knowledge, humor, and real learning if you study intensely.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Students repeatedly say even strong A students struggle for C, and top grades are rare without extreme study.

All evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Chemistry content plus her pace and self-made problems make the course feel brutal for most students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and helpful, while others list it as ; missing class still hurts preparation.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again sentiment is very low overall, with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Tough grader tags and and sig figs, dominate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report 15-40 hours of , and constant exam pressure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

She clearly knows chemistry and can inspire some learners, but many .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grade pressure centers on a few self-written midterms and finals plus nitpicked lab reports.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

survivors credit mastery, while many call the class a nightmare of dropouts and .

Main concern

Self-written trick tests and error crush many GPAs.

What students said

“We had 40 people in class , and only 15 survived , including me.”
CHEM051
“ ”
CHEM101
“THE BEST CHEMISTRY TEACHER AT VALLEY!”
CHEM51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard, often self-made, and frequently said not to match textbook practice.

Self-written testsTrick questionsWritten examsSig figs matterFew practice exams

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe , and sparse practice exams.

Self-written testsTrick questionsWritten examsSig figs matter
“she makes the and tries to trick you.”
CHEM051
“Written exams.”
CHEM51
“ .”
CHEM102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and polarized praise. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Grade Risk

14/100

“You will struggle for a C, I promise you.”

🎯 Teaching Polarization

46/100

“She's definitely a , BUT she's also a great teacher.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“Save your gpa if you plan to transfer.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Takes of .
  • only 15 survived
  • No fair chance to get an A.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she never gives you answer, she will force you to think
  • puts a lot of effort into her lectures
  • be prepared to teach yourself.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is abusive, inflexible, and unreasonable.
  • the sweetest person ever

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

97

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

pattern of harsh exams and high attrition, with a stable pro-con split.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 58
3 out of 518
2 out of 59
1 out of 521

Course coverage

CHEM5117 reviews
CHEM1029 reviews
CHEM1016 reviews
CHEM0514 reviews
CHEM683 reviews
Show 9 more courses
1012 reviews
512 reviews
15341 review
CHEM11611 review
CHEM11771 review
CHEM17171 review
CHEM30621 review
CHEMI11611 review
CHEMISTR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1