AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Ratha Koam

COUNS001 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Likely a gentle, low-stress counseling option if the single review reflects her usual style.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and helpfulLight homeworkAccessible outside classGood feedbackEasy A potential
  • Single review paints her as nice, supportive, and willing to help in and out of class.
  • Workload is light with occasional short journals and a required workshop.
  • Content seems easy and , but sample size is only one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Student earned an A with light journals, a workshop, and low reported difficulty.

All ; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Difficulty is rated 1 with and straightforward counseling class tasks.

Evidence is only from the single in-person COUNS001 review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory for this class.

Only in-person evidence exists and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

The and emphasizes her helpfulness and care.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Low difficulty, A grade, and light low-stakes writing suggest forgiving assessment.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Occasional short journals and one workshop; student says there is .

Format shift

Workload detail comes only from the in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Caring and helpful overall, though she often reads from slides.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is limited to one in-person comment.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears to be journals and a workshop rather than exams.

Format shift

No online assessment evidence; in-person mentions journals and a workshop only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

students, uses slides, and assigns light journal work.

Main concern

, so students wanting dynamic lectures could feel underwhelmed.

What students said

“ and goes out of her way to help in and out of class.”
COUNS001
“Theres not much homework, you just write about a page/half a page for a journal every once in a while.”
COUNS001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not describe formal exams; the course seems assignment- and workshop-based.

Journal writingWorkshop requirementNo exam details reported

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review mentions journals and a workshop, not proctored or closed-book exams.

JournalsWorkshop
“Theres not much homework, you just write about a page/half a page for a journal every once in a while.”
COUNS001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and goes out of her way to help in and out of class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review only. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Supportive Instructor

76/100

“ and goes out of her way to help in and out of class.”

🪶 Light Workload

92/100

“Theres not much homework, you just write about a page/half a page for a journal every once in a while.”

🎯 Easy Course Feel

90/100

“You do have to attend a workshop but she can help you find one to go to.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She read off the but she knows the materials.
  • Accessible outside class

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • A
  • 1

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2019 review exists, so scores are provisional despite clear detail in that single comment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUNS0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values