AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Gordon Armstrong

FT209 · FIRETEK201 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

but cannot teach or run the course technology.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationTech StrugglesKnows FieldUnclear LecturesNot Recommended
  • Both reviews rate quality at 1 and .
  • unlocking and due dates fail; questions go unanswered.
  • respected firefighter knowledge but and classroom tech issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A despite chaos, but reviews do not show a .

One online and one in-person review; little grade-path detail overall.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but frustration stems from delivery not content rigor.

Both formats report low difficulty with poor delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Online listed attendance mandatory; .

; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and both reviews rate teaching as ineffective.

Both online and in-person students discourage taking him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Too .

Format shift

Insufficient detail in either format.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reading expected online; workload intensity otherwise not well described.

Format shift

Limited evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Both formats cite failed communication, tech problems, and .

Format shift

Consistently poor across online and in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Respected retired firefighter who struggles to lecture clearly and handle room technology.

Main concern

Knowledge .

What students said

“some folks just aren't cut out to teach what they know.”
FT209

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online delivery broke on unlock times and due dates; clarification emails were misunderstood.

Main concern

Instructor not tech-proficient for online course management.

What students said

“Teacher is barely technologically proficient, which is a problem for an online class.”
FIRETEK201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher is barely technologically proficient, which is a problem for an online class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person). Credibility rating: Low.

💻 Online Course Chaos

10/100

“ , due dates would change at random.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“I wish I'd skipped it.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Delivery

  • , due dates would change at random.
  • Ineffective at communication overall.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • He frequently had problems with the technology in the room
  • .
  • some folks just aren't cut out to teach what they know.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews years apart provide thin, one-sided evidence with little assessment detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FIRETEK2011 review
FT2091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values