AI Rate Professor

Writing

David Diakoff

MATH328 · ALG1111 · MATH112 · MATH245 · STAT225 · MATH265 · MATH120 · ALGTR2 · MATH110 · MATH238 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH275 · MATH225 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you learn from structured lectures and will study notes/homework for tests; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyLecture heavyPolarizingClear when preparedNo-frills grader
  • Reviews and dull unprofessional note-reading.
  • Grades depend heavily on quizzes and .
  • , and ; others struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, and students must study notes and homework consistently to earn strong marks.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is standard-to-hard with mixed difficulty ratings; clarity helps some students but pace and volume still challenge others.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but and falling-behind comments make showing up effectively required.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

A and strong praise from prepared students outweigh harsh avoid-him reviews.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tags and comments call him a tough or and little .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but and exams keep overall effort moderate.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

, and even funny; others call them dull, note-bound, and unprofessional.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Repeated TEST HEAVY comments, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

or slam boring note-copying and harsh tests.

Main concern

and uneven lecture engagement.

What students said

“You show up to class, you take notes, you pass the class. He's very thorough, and .”
MATH125
“Super unprofessional... During the whole class just copying problems from his notes, doesnt try to explain how to set up the word problem.”
MATH275
“His quizzes and .”
MATH225

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; some say tests match lectures, others say they feel mismatched and unforgiving.

Test heavyWeekly quizzesMaterial-aligned testsLittle extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

chapters and grades driven by exams more than homework.

Test heavyChapter quizzesTests from class materialNo extra credit often
“ . . Tests are straight from material covered in class.”
MATH238
“Test have nothing to do with what he tells you to study for. you ”
MATH110
“Study and the results will show.”
STAT225

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You show .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and efficiently.”

🧪

48/100

“you ”

👎 Polarizing Experience

30/100

“Probably one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ , if you want to learn, but drive nervous.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and efficiently
  • .
  • just copying problems from his notes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but not surprising.
  • If you do the work... you will do well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Warning Signs

  • Super unprofessional.
  • THE dullest and .
  • 75% of the students dropped his class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across many years and courses with rich detail and consistent polarization patterns.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

STAT2254 reviews
MATH2253 reviews
ALG11112 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH2382 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH2752 reviews
ALGTR21 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1121 review
MATH1201 review
MATH2271 review
MATH2451 review
MATH2651 review
MATH3281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1