AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alvard Tsvikyan

MATH113 · MATH112 · MATH3402 · MATH115 · MATH3413 · MATH125 · MATH114 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will attend every class and ; she is excellent for students who struggle with math.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient Math ExplainerAttendance MattersMyMathLab HomeworkExtra Credit HelpNo Calculator Often
  • and real care make tough algebra feel learnable.
  • , and phone rules are strict, but grading offers partial and .
  • Most students who show up and do the work succeed and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is very reachable if , and use extra or partial credit.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, and makes developmental math manageable for struggling students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

Skip-class warnings are constant; missing class is widely said to tank the grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Near-universal praise and 100 percent would-take-again support her as a top LAVC math choice.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Partial credit, , and fair tests reward effort without free A's.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and , but overall load is not overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

89/100

Students repeatedly credit clear step-by-step teaching, patience, humor, and genuine care.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and written exams all matter, with test reviews before exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person math with , and supportive but firm classroom control.

Main concern

and no-calculator rules punish absences or weak arithmetic habits.

What students said

“Honestly was the easiest A ever, and I actually struggle with math”
MATH125
“She is an and you will be fine”
MATH115
“she basically reviews the ”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lectures, often reviewed in class, sometimes without calculators.

Written TestsTest Review Before ExamNo Calculator OftenPartial CreditDrops Lowest Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

credit, and often ban calculators.

Written TestsPre-Test ReviewNo Calculator OftenPartial Credit
“ ”
MATH125
“She would always go over the ”
MATH125
“Yes, it's true, you cannot use calculators”
MATH114

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I thought i was bad at math until i took her. I love her teaching style and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person , and fair grading. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Recommendation Heat

94/100

“This professor if by far the ”

🎯 Teachability

89/100

“She teaches and and takes time after class if you still need help”

📌

14/100

“if you plan on not coming often do not expect to pass her class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she really cares
  • Absolutely hilarious and so thorough
  • She will teach the material until you get it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easiest A ever, and I actually struggle with math
  • Good grades are not given away, but if you do the work, you'll do well
  • gives and partial credit

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Rules

  • Hw matters, so do it
  • as well
  • don't be rude put your cell phones away

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty mostly detailed reviews over many years show strong , and fair effort-based grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 512
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11522 reviews
MATH12518 reviews
MATH1123 reviews
10811 review
1251 review
Show 5 more courses
32451 review
MATH1131 review
MATH1141 review
MATH34021 review
MATH34131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

4

B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1