AI Rate Professor

English

Leslie Hope

ENGLI101 · ENGLISH021 · ENGOL · ENG21 · ENGLIENGL · ENGLI21 · ENG033 · ENGLS21 · ENG021 · ENG0114 · ENGLISH33 · ENGLISH240 · ENGLISH21 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGLI33 · ENG240 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no other option and while .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolitically BiasedHarsh GraderRude FeedbackUnhelpfulEssay Overload
  • Nearly all students call her rude, unhelpful, and harshly critical of student work.
  • Essays and writing skills.
  • Heavy workload with vague directions and little guidance make grades hard to earn.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Harsh scoring, vague instructions, and little help make an A rare even for strong students.

Both online and ; most evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is dense political essay work with high difficulty ratings and .

Online and and heavy; evidence is mostly in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students report instructional value.

; online reviews rarely clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Almost every review urges students to switch or stay away due to rudeness and poor teaching.

Online and ; volume is overwhelmingly in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students report minimum scores, ripped-apart essays, and grades that punish disagreement.

Format shift

examples in-person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many essays, nightly exercises, and weekly writing create a heavy load for little learning payoff.

Format shift

Heavy workload complaints appear in both online and in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

, and almost no useful instruction.

Format shift

Teaching quality is rated poorly across both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on frequent political essays and discussions rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Essay-heavy assessment is consistent online and in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid-labeled reviews overwhelmingly describe politics-first , and little English skill teaching.

Main concern

Political bias, belittling comments, and .

What students said

“She is a total JOKE! ... .”
ENG021
“Please stay away from this teacher at all cost. I learned more about politics than writing.”
ENG101
“WORSTE TEACHER EVER!!!! SHE IS SO FULL OF HERSELF AND MAKES YOU WRITE ABOUT BUSH AND STUPID POLITICS.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and Read the Syllabus answers with little real help.

Main concern

and unhelpful responses waste time instead of teaching writing.

What students said

“ and to be honest she's very rude. .”
ENGLISH021
“ , and most of her answers to our questions, she replies back saying "Read the Syllabus".”
ENGLISH21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and .

Essay-heavy assessmentVague assignment instructionsLittle exam detail in reviews

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize essays and .

Political essay focusNo rewritesSlow paper turnaround
“No rewrites. Just say what she wants to hear, you'll do well.”
ENGL101
“it took her 4-6 weeks .”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctored or open-book exams; assessment is assignment-driven.

Assignment-drivenUnclear submission guidance
“ .”
ENGLISH21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please stay away from this teacher at all cost. I learned more about politics than writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and bias. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Quality Collapse

15/100

“This is the worst teacher to have ever been employed by LAVC. .”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“IF YOU DON'T HAVE TIME TO READ ALL THE COMMENTS ON THIS PAGE I WILL CUT ”

⚖️

16/100

“Today she just killed my A ... so low that just killed my A”

📢 Political Bias

20/100

“All we talked about was politics and if you didn't agree with her ideas your grade would reflect it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she said was get tutoring
  • and to be honest she's very rude

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • VERY VERY EXTREMELY TOUGH SCORING!!! My last paper she gave me 1 point
  • Lots of work to do, minimum scores
  • I am a "A" student and I could hardly got "B" from her class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Climate

  • SHE LOVES DEGRADING HER STUDENTS
  • she belittled me a lot
  • She's MEAN and rude!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews over many years show strong negative consistency despite older dates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 519
1 out of 545

Course coverage

ENG10123 reviews
ENGLI1015 reviews
ENG213 reviews
ENG0212 reviews
ENG2402 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENGLI212 reviews
ENGLI332 reviews
ENGLISH332 reviews
ENG01141 review
ENG0331 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGLIENGL1 review
ENGLISH0211 review
ENGLISH211 review
ENGLISH2401 review
ENGLS211 review
ENGOL1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1