AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Glen Egbert

PHILO006 · PHIL06 · 3305PHI · PHILOSOPHY1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and ace high-stakes exams without practice materials.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest-heavy with no practiceSelf-written textbookUnstructured lecturesFunny but thin contentHit-or-miss philosophy
  • Grades rest almost entirely on midterm and path.
  • Many students found lectures bland, early-dismissing, and book-centered with little structure.
  • A and inspirational when they put real effort into philosophy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A and and questions that can reflect his own views.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits mid-range, but thin lecture structure and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is sometimes marked mandatory, yet multiple students say .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One glowing inspirational and complaints about unstructured, test-skewed classes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and final dominate; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

; burden concentrates on two major exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Personality and occasional clarity help, but many found lectures bland, early, and poorly structured.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grade is essentially midterm plus final, with almost no assignment cushion.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person philosophy classes felt unstructured: fun personality but sparse participation, self-authored book as main content, and .

Main concern

unsure what will be asked.

What students said

“ but so u go into it not knowing what ur supposed to know”
3305PHI
“50% of the grade is from the ”
PHILO006
“really makes topics crystal clear if ”
PHIL06

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

practice preview, and can include his own philosophical views.

Midterm and final onlyNo practice testsBook-centered questionsProfessor-view questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final with no practice tests and limited prep clarity.

Midterm 50 percentFinal 50 percentNo practice testsSelf-authored book
“ but so u go into it not knowing what ur supposed to know”
3305PHI
“50% of the grade is from the ”
PHILO006

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but so u go into it not knowing what ur supposed to know or what will be asked”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2015, highlighting structure, exams, and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“It was a very bland class for me & I didn't learn much from it.”

📝

28/100

“ but so u go into it not knowing what ur supposed to know”

📚 Book-Centered Course

40/100

“Everything is in the book which he had written.”

✨ Occasional Inspiration

70/100

“Class was inspirational”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • fun lecture.
  • Not very structured and tends to leave early
  • if you put effort

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but
  • 50% of the grade is from the
  • i had high hopes but

Theme 3

📖 About Course Materials

  • Textbook for the class is one that he's written himself
  • Everything is in the book which he had written

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four dated in-person reviews with mixed detail and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

3305PHI1 review
PHIL061 review
PHILO0061 review
PHILOSOPHY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1