AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Minna Ng

PSYCH1 · PSYCH01 · PSY002 · PSYCH041 · STATS3369 · PSYCH12 · PSYCH02 · PSYCH2 · STAT101 · STATS101 · PSYC1 · PSYCH001 · STATISTICS · PSYCH002 · PSYCH0023349 · PSY02 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will read, show up on time, and if you only want an easy GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate lecturerTough but fairRead the bookStrict attendanceWorth the work
  • Most students love her energy, humor, and deep subject command.
  • , and attendance; she is not a free A for GE shoppers.
  • Hybrid stats is friendlier; and exam-tricky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

As are common with real work, but , and As.

Online hybrid stats felt easier; and rigor.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Average difficulty sits mid-to-high; content is manageable when you read and engage, not light.

option.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and phones; skipping activity days hurts the grade.

Hybrid stats and quiz meetings.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and inspiration despite tough grading outliers.

Both formats recommend her, with hybrid stats especially praised versus Math 227.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her easy with ; if you follow the syllabus exactly.

Format shift

stats.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and activities create steady load.

Format shift

Hybrid stats centers on labs and quizzes; psych adds paper and presentation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Enthusiastic, organized, humorous lectures with strong help for engaged students.

Format shift

Praise is strong across formats; one online hybrid review still rates five stars.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of exams, quizzes, paper, oral presentation, and .

Format shift

Online hybrid emphasizes labs and short quizzes; psych leans exams plus paper.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person psych and stats are energetic and rigorous: inspiring , and presentation.

Main concern

Tough grading and .

What students said

“She is inspiring, encouraging, and tough.”
PSYCH12
“READ THE BOOK, it is essential for the exams.”
PSYCH2
“She is by far the and tester I have ever had in my academic career.”
PSYCH02

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One hybrid STAT101 and short quizzes plus online discussions as better than traditional math stats.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“You have to meet once a and .”
STAT101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually pull from lectures and full chapters; ; hybrid uses frequent short quizzes.

Lecture plus book examsNon-cumulative final reportedQuizzes oftenStudy guides sometimes incompleteHybrid weekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

mismatched to study guides; one note of non-cumulative final.

Book essential for examsTricky testsNon-cumulative finalResearch paper and presentation
“ so that is a PLUS!!!”
PSYCH02
“READ THE BOOK, it is essential for the exams.”
PSYCH2
“You can study her study guides all you want and still will get a C on the test.”
PSYCH02

Online

Hybrid STAT101 uses weekly short on-campus quizzes and labs with online discussions; .

Weekly short quizzesIn-person labs once a weekOnline discussions
“You have to meet once a and .”
STAT101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is inspiring, encouraging, and tough. and very professional atmosphere.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (1 online hybrid, 21 in person), balancing passion praise with . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ ! She gave interesting lectures, and her enthusiasm for the subject matter was contagious.”

⚖️

52/100

“She is a though and will make you work hard for your grade.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“You have to read the book to get a good grade in this class”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • enthusiasm for the subject matter was contagious
  • she is funny, her teaching keeps you intrigued
  • so you can actually learn it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • READ THE BOOK, it is essential for the exams
  • and tester I have ever had
  • She's and easy grader & gives

Theme 3

⏰

  • She and phone usage
  • Either be on time for class or don't go at all
  • Many in class activities, so it would be wise to show up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews with both glowing and critical detail across psych and stats yield a reliable blended picture.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH23 reviews
PSYCH022 reviews
PSYCH12 reviews
STAT1012 reviews
74301 review
Show 12 more courses
PSY0021 review
PSY021 review
PSYC11 review
PSYCH0011 review
PSYCH0021 review
PSYCH00233491 review
PSYCH011 review
PSYCH0411 review
PSYCH121 review
STATISTICS1 review
STATS1011 review
STATS33691 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values