AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

. Nalbandyan

MATH113 · MATH112 · MATH1335 · MATH215 · MATH115 · MATCH105 · MATH238 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH225 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and want real math skill; skip if you need soft lectures or light workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of HomeworkKnows SubjectMood DependentPartial Credit GraderTests Similar to HW
  • and central to success.
  • ; lectures and temper draw mixed reviews.
  • Great for students who want to learn math; avoid if you want an easy A with light work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with practice, but and not an easy A.

Most evidence is in person; the one online review is more positive but still effort-based.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges by course level; success mainly depends on daily practice rather than extreme theory alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn absences make you fall behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; praise for learning mixes with .

Online sample is one glowing review; in-person opinions split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Often gives partial credit for understanding, but can be a .

Format shift

In-person comments drive this; online sample is sparse.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Daily or .

Format shift

; online detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Strong subject knowledge and help for some; .

Format shift

In-person reviews are polarized; the sole online review is highly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and a final; homework often predicts exam content.

Format shift

In-person comments describe 4-5 tests plus final and daily HW.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is knowledgeable with ; tests often mirror homework for prepared students, but style and temper polarize.

Main concern

Lots of , and sometimes irritable lectures.

What students said

“The biggest part of because it takes some time, not a lot.”
MATH238
“ and not an easy A But if you want to learn then he is professor to have.”
MATH125
“He may know the subject but I think he shouldn't be teaching because he only read a .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online MATH227 review calls him approachable and one of the .

Main concern

Only one online review; hard to generalize format differences.

What students said

“Took the class 2 times. He saved me on the third trial. One of the . very approachable.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several timed tests and a final; for some.

Multiple TestsFinal ExamHomework-Similar ProblemsPartial CreditStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, study guides, and sometimes harder finals.

In-Person TestsFinal Can Be HarderPartial CreditDrop Lowest Sometimes
“ , and very similar if not easier on his tests.”
MATH238
“ but he makes it hard on the final”
MATH1335
“Gives study guide, and .”
MATH113

Online

Online review .

“Took the class 2 times. He saved me on the third trial. One of the . very approachable.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and not an easy A But if you want to learn then he is professor to have.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews (1 online, 23 in , and mixed teaching tone. Credibility rating: High.

📝

28/100

“ . Not knowing we have other classes to.”

🧠 Learning Value

70/100

“If .”

⚖️

48/100

“ and has the ability to see if you understand complex concepts and then gives you proper credit”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He may know the subject but I think he shouldn't be teaching because he only read a
  • passion.
  • He seems irritable when questions are asked.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A
  • .
  • !!!!! A loooott of hw you can't imagine.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Overall very good and understandable person.
  • he has a little bad temper though
  • This gut is an arrogant SOB

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

24 reviews over many years with and mixed but detailed opinions.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 58
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1255 reviews
MATH2275 reviews
MATH1124 reviews
MATH2153 reviews
MATH13352 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATCH1051 review
MATH1131 review
MATH1151 review
MATH2251 review
MATH2381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values