AI Rate Professor

Business

J S Seigel Clark

BUS325176 · BUS32 · COAT32 · CLASS · CAOT32 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you have any other instructor option for the same course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid At All CostsUnprofessionalTreats Adults Like KidsConfusing SyllabusWastes Class Time
  • Every review strongly advises avoiding her business and CAOT classes.
  • , and focused on seating rules over content.
  • Classwork feels childish and pointless even when the material itself is not hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Content is not intellectually hard, but and poor teaching make grades feel unpredictable rather than free.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say the class is easy or joke-level, yet still unsatisfying because and childish.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

At , and class time is tightly controlled around seating and hand-holding.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every and calls her the worst professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; confusion and wasted time dominate, with one student still reporting an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments exist and are often called silly or pointless, but volume is not described as crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students unanimously describe confusing syllabi, unprofessional behavior, and almost no useful adult-level instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and class activities more than structured exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person BUS and CAOT sections are described as chaotic, condescending, and content-light, with students begging others to switch professors.

Main concern

Unclear assignments, wasted class time on seating and rules, and a demeaning classroom tone.

What students said

“ . . Avoid her class at all costs! HORRIBLE TEACHER!”
BUS32
“Stay away, if you need this class, take it with someone else. ANYONE else.”
CLASS
“Giant waste of 3 hours a night. If you like to be talked to and treated like a 5 year old... this is the class for you.”
BUS325176

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; frustration centers on confusing daily work instead.

Unclear AssignmentsLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam structure; assignments and classroom management dominate complaints.

Unclear Assignments
“ . Some os the assignments were silly and pointless.”
CAOT32

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . Avoid her class at all costs! HORRIBLE TEACHER!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 consistently negative in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Do not take her class.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Absolutely horrible. To be perfectly honest, I am confused on why she is teaching at all.”

👶 Classroom Tone

15/100

“If you like to be talked to and treated like a 5 year old... this is the class for you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • SHE IS BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING.
  • Syllabus is confusing, most of class time is wasted on senseless things.
  • She contradicts herself most of the time.

Theme 2

📉 About Overall Experience

  • She is the .
  • Take this class anywhere else from anyone else.
  • Horrible class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven reviews exist, but they are highly consistent in tone and detail across several years.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

BUS322 reviews
CAOT322 reviews
BUS3251761 review
CLASS1 review
COAT321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1