AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Joni Siegel-Clark

CAOT32 · CAOT032 · COAT32 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want real instruction; you will largely teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't TeachRude PersonalityAccuses StudentsWaste of TimeAttendance Points
  • Most students call her one of the .
  • Class time is spent on personal talk instead of lecture.
  • One older review finds her friendly but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Content can feel easy, but the and , and group work make an A less automatic.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students describe the material as basic or even kindergarten-level, with almost no substantive teaching of advanced content.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

One detailed if you miss class, so .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Five of six reviews rate her a 1 and urge students to stay away due to personality and lack of teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Even the positive review says her grading scale makes an easy class harder, with major weight on exams and presentations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Little structured homework is described; complaints focus on empty class .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Nearly all comments say she does not teach, is rude, and the class feels pointless.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and group presentation make up most of the grade; early assignments count little.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: rude demeanor, accusations of cheating, almost no real teaching, and wasted class time.

Main concern

Hostile classroom climate and little actual instruction.

What students said

“I find her one of the in college.”
COAT32
“she doesn't teach at all she spends class time for just talking about everything except lecture.”
CAOT32
“doesn't teach at all you should learn by yourself, waste of time during class”
CAOT32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and group presentation, with .

MidtermFinalGroup PresentationAttendance Points

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group presentation as the main grade drivers.

MidtermFinalGroup Presentation
“The , and group presentation make up for the majority of your grade.”
CAOT32

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I find her one of the in college. Horrible personality and accuses everyone of being wrong and cheating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching failure and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“she doesn't teach at all she spends class time for just talking about everything except lecture.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“LAVC for having better output should fire her.”

😠 Classroom Climate

18/100

“She is rude, disrespectful. Her class was pointless. I have not learned one thing!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't teach at all
  • class was pointless

Theme 2

💢 About Personality

  • Horrible personality
  • accuses everyone of being wrong and cheating
  • She is rude, disrespectful

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy class but she makes it somewhat difficult with
  • if you don't go to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed 2013-2014 reviews are highly consistent in tone, but the sample is small and over a decade old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CAOT323 reviews
COAT322 reviews
CAOT0321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values