AI Rate Professor

English

Marion Heyn

ENGLISH101 · ENG7078 · ENGLI7014 · ENG28 · ENGL021 · ENGL28 · ENGLISH33 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGLI7076 · ENG103 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want rigorous writing practice and can handle a heavy, strict load; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadTough GraderDisorganized OnlineHigh StandardsPolarizing
  • Most reviews warn of massive workload and .
  • Online organization and changing instructions are frequent complaints.
  • A minority say you learn a lot if you can handle college-level rigor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students describe low grades even after writing-center help and full effort; many call an A unrealistic.

One positive easy-class online review contrasts with and face-to-face difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Workload and standards are repeatedly called college-level and excessive, not light survey content.

Online-tagged review says easy; most other reviews describe a very hard course.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

; rigidity shows more in and deadlines than seat checks.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

A large share of , though a dedicated minority strongly recommend the rigor.

The one online-tagged review recommends her; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Frequent claims of tough, unfair, or low and writing-center-approved work.

Format shift

; the single online-tagged review does not discuss tough grades.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly report more homework than other classes combined, long syllabi, and constant new assignments.

Format shift

Heavy load is the dominant theme in in-person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some call her an excellent educator who builds real writing skill; , and demoralizing.

Format shift

Online-tagged review is warm; bulk of in-person-tagged reviews are negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and group projects drive grades.

Format shift

Evidence mostly from in-person-tagged reviews that often describe online course designs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person-tagged reviews are mostly critical: , and many explicit avoid warnings, with a smaller group praising real learning.

Main concern

Overwhelming workload and .

What students said

“ !!!!DO NOT TAKE HER !!!!DO NOT TAKE HER !!!!!Never!!!!!!”
ENG28
“her online class is torture!!.. insanely workload.. .”
ENGLI7014
“She expects the and if you follow her directions, you will perform better than you expected.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single flagged online review is positive and calls the class easy and understanding.

Main concern

Too few online-tagged reviews to trust against many negative online-experience comments filed as in person.

What students said

“She is a nice Professor, easy class. .”
ENGLISH33

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Timed writings and inflexible exam scheduling ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

Timed Writing TestsWeekday Morning ExamsHeavy AssignmentsGroup ProjectsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams scheduled on weekday mornings for working adults.

Timed Writing TestsWeekday Morning ExamsTough Grading
“she scheduled exams on weekday mornings when ”
ENG7078
“It's true, she requires a LOT of work, including 2 difficult timed writing tests.”
ENG101

Online

The single online-tagged .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!! She is the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (1 online, 28 in person), highlighting workload and polarizing rigor. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

12/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“I worked long hours on my essay took it to the writing center they said it was good and what grade did I recieve?D!!”

🎓 Learning Upside

55/100

“Taking her class, helped me learn .”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“ !!!!DO NOT TAKE HER !!!!DO NOT TAKE HER !!!!!Never!!!!!!”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • insanely workload
  • ridiculous load of

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • So
  • and change on a whim
  • Excellent educator!

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she fails students alot
  • Definitely a
  • if you follow her directions, you will perform better than you expected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews over many years show a consistent majority pattern of heavy load and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG10111 reviews
ENG288 reviews
ENG70782 reviews
ENG1031 review
ENGL0211 review
Show 6 more courses
ENGL1011 review
ENGL281 review
ENGLI70141 review
ENGLI70761 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH331 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1