AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Robert Rodriguez

CAOT1 · BIT25 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Consider him for typing or CAOT, but treat BIT-style sections with caution given the harsh critique.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPolarizing by courseHelpful typing coachConfusing in BITNice and professionalHands-on practice heavy
  • Typing or , and skill gains.
  • The BIT25 review is extremely negative on clarity and learning value.
  • With only three reviews, experience appears highly course-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

CAOT students report easy success and an A, but the BIT review frames the class as hard and .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Typing content is described as learnable and low difficulty, while .

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; one BIT review says do not take the class at all.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student earned an A in CAOT and found him helpful, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

BIT students report doing all book exercises; CAOT load is lighter skill practice without detailed complaint.

Format shift

All workload comments come from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

CAOT students call him super helpful and professional; and teaches little.

Format shift

All teaching comments come from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize book exercises and typing practice more than formal exams.

Format shift

All assessment comments come from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person CAOT typing students praise help and professionalism, while one BIT student calls the .

Main concern

Course quality may swing hard by subject; self-teaching risk reported in BIT25.

What students said

“He is super nice, very helpful, he will go out of his way to make sure students get the material.”
CAOT1
“ . and annoying.”
BIT25
“ ”
CAOT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears practice and exercise based.

Skill practice focusBook exercises

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or open-book policy; work centers on book exercises and typing skill.

Book exercisesTyping practice
“He will make you do all the exercises in the book without explaining.”
BIT25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you so only with prof. Rodriquez. He is super nice, very helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with conflicting course outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Split

52/100

“You've better chances of learning if you sit home and read the book. Waste of money. Waste of time.”

👍 CAOT Support

85/100

“he will go out of his way to make sure students get the material.”

⚠️ Course Risk

20/100

“ . and annoying.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and annoying
  • You will for sure learn how to type fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1 in CAOT
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5 in BIT
  • A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • dressed up professionally, and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2013-2014 split by course type, so conclusions are thin and course-specific.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CAOT12 reviews
BIT251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1