AI Rate Professor

Electronics

Art Pietropaolo

ELECT3143 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you have absolutely no other choice.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesConfusing slideshowsGets angry at questionsIllegible board workAvoid if possible
  • Single scathing review calls him the and urges avoidance.
  • and confuse students.
  • He allegedly refuses questions and cannot write legibly on the board.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

High difficulty rating plus chaotic teaching implies grades are .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

and material harder because of presentation chaos.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Student unless there is no other choice.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; hostile classroom climate suggests little leniency.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Workload details are sparse; .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Described as , and angry when asked questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does not clearly describe how and assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person electronics review describes confusing slides, illegible board work, and hostility to questions.

Main concern

and hostility when students ask for help.

What students said

“ !!! unless you have no other choise.”
ELECT3143

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! unless you have no other choise.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 highly negative in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“He is very unclear always jumping around his slideshow presentations with a lazer pointer that confuses u more.”

👎

5/100

“ unless you have no other choise.”

😤 Classroom Climate

10/100

“gets angry when u ask a question.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always jumping around his slideshow presentations with a lazer pointer that confuses u more.
  • never writes anything legable on the board.
  • answers questions by telling you to read.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Character

  • gets angry when u ask a question.
  • too old to teach needs to retire.
  • Awefull teach

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one highly negative 2011 review exists, so confidence is low despite extreme tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ELECT31431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values