AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

George Holloway

MATH240 · MATH213 · MATH245 · MATH115 · TRIG · MATH140 · MATH275 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard of HearingToo FastSelf-Teach With BookDoes Not TeachFrustrating
  • Most students say he teaches poorly, mumbles, and goes far too fast.
  • Hard-of-hearing issues make questions hard to get answered.
  • You largely teach yourself from the book and outside help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Most students need heavy outside help to pass; only .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material feels hard mainly because lectures are too fast and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Majority urge taking someone else and call the class a waste of time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; one Diff Eq review said tests were easy when told what to study.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, but self-study and tutoring replace class support.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Dominant theme is that he cannot teach, ignores questions, and moves too fast.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

; and study the night before when topics are previewed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

hard of hearing, too fast, little help, and students must self-teach; a few older positives exist for Diff Eq and caring moments.

Main concern

Pace and communication make learning in class nearly impossible for many.

What students said

“He moves so fast in class that you are basically taking notes that make no sense to you until you do the homework.”
MATH245
“He DOES NOT teach! he just mumbles as he's working the problem.”
MATH245
“The gonan test you on.”
MATH275

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but most students struggle due to poor lecture prep.

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if he tells you what will be covered, but lecture prep is weak.

Topic-previewed testsSelf-study dependent
“The gonan test you on.”
MATH275
“I had to get a lot of outside help to pass this ”
MATH245

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He DOES NOT teach! he just mumbles as he's working the problem. The class is very frustrating because you have to teach yourself with the book”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting pace, hearing barriers, and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Class was a complete waste of time, and didn't help me to learn or love math anymore.”

🙉 Communication Barrier

20/100

“hard of hearing, have to yell to get your question answered, doesnt answer your question completely.”

⚡ Too Fast Pace

25/100

“He covers material too quickly. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He DOES NOT teach
  • just mumbles as he's working the problem
  • makes math exremelely boring and unclear

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to get a lot of outside help to pass
  • you have to teach yourself with the book
  • The gonan test you on

Theme 3

👂 About Communication

  • hard of hearing
  • getting your questions answered is a chore
  • students have to repeat it to him until he finally gets it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

12 in-person reviews across many years show strong negative consistency, with a few outliers.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH2455 reviews
TRIG2 reviews
MATH1151 review
MATH1401 review
MATH2131 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH2401 review
MATH2751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values