AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Linka Griswold

PSY41 · PSYCH1 · STAT001 · PSYCH041 · STATS1 · STATS1234 · RESEAA · STAT1 · STATSTAT · STATS101 · STATS3050 · PSYCH101 · PSYCH41 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend and use ; she works hard so you can pass a hard subject.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStats made approachableLots of extra creditOpen-note testsCaring and helpfulWants students to pass
  • Strong teaching support for tough stats and psych courses with team work and .
  • but often open notes or open book with abundant .
  • A minority find lectures book-heavy or discouraging, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

book options and plentiful , so good grades are reachable with effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats and research methods feel intense and challenging even when support is strong.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

, but students say you should attend class and do classwork to do well.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most reviewers strongly recommend her for making hard material passable with help and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Fair and hard to fail if you engage.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and sometimes accelerated pacing keep the load real, though helps.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Widely praised as , and skilled at relating stats to real life; a few call lectures book-based.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of multiple-choice exams, homework, classwork, discussion boards, and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person stats and psych classes mix challenging content with , and heavy from a caring instructor.

Main concern

Material can be intense and a few students say lectures do not prepare them for .

What students said

“ , but not overly stressful because open notes and .”
STAT001
“She also provides a lot of extra credits, so it's impossible to do badly”
STAT1
“If .”
STATS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but are often open notes or open book with strong support.

Open notesOpen book sometimesExtra creditMultiple choice

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book, multiple choice, and supported by .

Open notesOpen book testsExtra creditTrick questions
“open notes and .”
STAT001
“ ”
STAT1
“Be Careful on the tests, because there is trick questions”
STAT1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She definitely made the and was extremely fair and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Student Support

88/100

“She's really interested in seeing her students do well.”

📝

82/100

“open notes and .”

🅰️ Lifeline

80/100

“She also provides a lot of extra credits, so it's impossible to do badly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She creates a comfortable environment while and hands-on.
  • She helps students understand a difficult topic with fun and enthusiasm.
  • her lectures were always interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy grade!
  • , but not overly stressful
  • If .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and understandable person.
  • Shes a valuable staff and in my personal opinion.. making LAVC a better school.
  • she cares about her students a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine mostly positive reviews from 2007-2010 with and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STAT16 reviews
STATS16 reviews
PSYCH415 reviews
STAT0013 reviews
PSY411 review
Show 8 more courses
PSYCH0411 review
PSYCH11 review
PSYCH1011 review
RESEAA1 review
STATS1011 review
STATS12341 review
STATS30501 review
STATSTAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values