AI Rate Professor

Art

Ronald Petrosky

ART201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want to actually learn to draw and will attend every class with work on time; skip if you only need an easy credit.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict But FairClear VisualsAttendance QuizzesReal Artist MentorshipOn-Time Assignments
  • Strong teaching for students who truly want to learn drawing skills.
  • and demanding, closer to professional standards.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

He grades hard with professional standards and will not pass students who only chase credit.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly high and students say real effort is required to pass.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Fun quizzes are used as and multiple students say .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, not for easy-credit seekers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students describe hard, precise grading and high professional expectations.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments must be on time and class demands real drawing practice, without sounding overwhelming.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Praised as a great artist and teacher who breaks concepts down with .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Studio assignments and timely work dominate, with .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Students call him a fantastic, helpful art teacher with clear demos, but expect and .

Main concern

and art credit.

What students said

“Aside from being a great artist, he's a fantastic teacher.”
ART201
“Rather Strict but as for an art class)”
ART201
“ ”
ART201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and sometimes offer rather than formal high-stakes exams.

Fun QuizzesAttendance ProofExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person fun quizzes serve as attendance checks and occasional , with .

Fun QuizzesAttendance ProofExtra Credit Quizzes
“He also gave out "fun quizes" randomly that gave to students that decided to stay the whole class!”
ART201
“he also gives fun quizes which are a several questions bout your favorites as proof dat you attend the class so ”
ART201
“ ").”
ART201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn how to draw, he will teach you. If you're just going for a credit, you won't pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person ART201 reviews emphasizing skill-focused teaching and strict standards. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Aside from being a great artist, he's a fantastic teacher.”

📏

32/100

“this professor grades very hard he thinks were professional artisits”

📍

18/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Value

74/100

“Great professor! If you want to learn how to draw, he will teach you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He broke instructions down in a way that made sense
  • very helpful!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Rather Strict but fair
  • grades very hard
  • If you're just going for a credit, you won't pass

Theme 3

📌

  • fun quizes randomly that gave

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and from 2009-2010.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART2014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values