AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Imelda Foley

CD44 · CD38 · CD45 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

; unclear teaching, heavy write-ups, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsHeavy Writing LoadNo ExamsVague GradingAvoid
  • Students say she cannot teach clearly and changes directions constantly.
  • Lots of in-class and out-of-class writing with .
  • ; half a class reportedly dropped.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report easy Cs but and heavy writing so an A is far from automatic.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and it should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review warns against her for and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students and hard work still yields only a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly and in-class writing assignments pile up with little guidance.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Comments call her the , and not suited to teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

No exams; and writing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Child Development sections draw harsh reviews for vague homework, constant syllabus changes, and .

Main concern

You may do all work and still not understand how grades are assigned.

What students said

“ MAKES EXAM, BUT YOU GET EASILY C”
CD44
“ homework. Never sticks to the syllabus”
CD38
“A LOT of . She is also not helpfull at all. One good thing is that there are no exams.”
CD38

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly note she does not give exams and .

No ExamsAssignment-Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report no exams and .

No ExamsLots of Writing Assignments
“One good thing is that there are no exams.”
CD38
“ , BUT YOU GET EASILY C”
CD44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to remain sane!!! Half the class dropped for the very same reasons I did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching failure, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“she is the .”

📝 Workload Pain

22/100

“LOTS OF ASSIGNMENTS IN CLASS AND OUT CLASS, WRITE WRITE WRITE”

❓

28/100

“YOU DON'T ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • NEVER KNOWS HOW TO TEACH
  • teaching is not her specialty by any means
  • and expects you to just do it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • YOU GET EASILY C
  • , BUT DESIRED TO GET CCCCCC
  • Never sticks to the syllabus, and changes directions on a whim.

Theme 3

⚠️ Recommendation

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed older in-person reviews are highly consistent but span 2006-2010 with .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CD383 reviews
CD441 review
CD451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values