AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Brenda Ingram-Cotton

MSOFFCAOT · CAOT82 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want real MS Office skills and ; expect some admin friction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMS Office ExpertTime-Consuming HomeworkFast Grading (Mixed)Clear InstructionsEasy A If Diligent
  • Many students call her the best CAOT82 teacher for learning MS Office properly.
  • .
  • A minority report slow grade posts and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Doing the homework and as an easy A, though it takes real hours.

; several comments still describe online-style CAOT work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is mostly straightforward Office skills but can overwhelm beginners without prior knowledge.

; several comments still describe online-style CAOT work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

; flexibility comments refer to online-style pacing rather than seat time.

; several comments still describe online-style CAOT work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Majority strongly recommend for real MS Office mastery despite some complaints about response and .

; several comments still describe online-style CAOT work.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and sometimes fast, but accuracy and timing of posts vary.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly call the and quizzes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and excellent Office resources; a .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and submitted Office work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Tagged in-person but comments describe CAOT82 online-style work; and skill gains while .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“It's an easy A! It is time consuming, but it is so ”
MSOFFCAOT
“She is the best CAOT 82 at Valley!”
CAOT82
“Terrible at posting grades on time, or accurately.”
CAOT82

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and homework but do not clearly describe webcam or .

Practice QuizzesHomework-HeavyNo Proctoring Details

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Quizzes and ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book finals.

Practice QuizzesHomework Submissions
“use student companion website for practice quizs; ”
MSOFFCAOT
“lots of .”
CAOT82

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you really want to learn MS Office 2007 PROPERLY! ... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person-counted reviews, highlighting skill gains, workload, and mixed admin support. Credibility rating: Medium.

💻 Skill Building

78/100

“you'll be a whiz on the computer, better prepared for a job”

⏱️ Workload

34/100

“this class requires some prior knowledge... Otherwise, you will spend long evenings doing the assignments.”

📬 Responsiveness Split

55/100

“ and responded quicky to e-mails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very patient with her students
  • Highly recomend this professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy A!
  • online , but still time consuming
  • the quizes are not easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ Admin Friction

  • She never returns emails or messages
  • Terrible at posting grades on time
  • Expect delayed responses to your emails from instructor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mixed but detailed reviews from 2005-2010 show a clear majority-positive pattern with a consistent workload complaint.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CAOT826 reviews
MSOFFCAOT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values