AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Salil Sharma

ACCTG001 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take Sharma for ACCTG 001 if you want practical CPA-driven accounting that builds a foundation for the next course and transfer.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPracticing CPATransfer-prep valueUseful real knowledgeSolid online instructorCareer-relevant
  • Practicing CPA background makes content practically useful.
  • ACCTG 001 prepared the student well for ACCTG 002 and CSU transfer.
  • Online experience rated excellent with moderate difficulty and an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Student earned an A at difficulty 2, implying reasonable effort rather than a walk-in A.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro accounting at moderate difficulty with no complaints about crushing complexity.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Student would take again and calls it a great class with lasting prep value.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

An A is reported without claims of harsh or .

Format shift

Based solely on one online review.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Moderate difficulty and no overload complaints suggest a steady, manageable accounting load.

Format shift

Based solely on one online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Student praises useful CPA experience and knowledge that made the class great and transfer-relevant.

Format shift

Based solely on one online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments highlight learning value and textbooks but .

Format shift

Based solely on one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ACCTG001 is described as a great, useful foundation class led by a practicing CPA with .

Main concern

; limited detail on workload structure or exams.

What students said

“It was a great class. Thankfully I learned some valuable information that helped me prepare for ACCTG 002 and later to transfer to CSU.”
ACCTG001
“Because he is a practicing CPA, I found his experience and knowledge to be useful.”
ACCTG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam format, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Because he is a practicing CPA, I found his experience and knowledge to be useful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review, highlighting CPA expertise and transfer prep value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“It was a great class.”

📘 Transfer Value

90/100

“I learned some valuable information that helped me prepare for ACCTG 002 and later to transfer to CSU.”

💼 Real-World Expertise

91/100

“Because he is a practicing CPA, I found his experience and knowledge to be useful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It was a great class
  • practicing CPA, I found his experience and knowledge to be useful
  • Yes

Theme 2

📈 About Outcomes & Prep

  • helped me prepare for ACCTG 002 and later to transfer to CSU
  • A
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 2

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2025 online review exists, with useful content but limited breadth and no tag corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCTG0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values