AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Arno Papazyan

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Only take if and ; outcomes look highly polarized.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized ReviewsPractice Matches ExamsNo HomeworkGrade Posting IssuesCaring vs Harsh Split
  • half love labs and
  • Recent positive reviews say do the labs and practice for an easy path
  • Older negatives cite missing transcript grades and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Supporters say practice and , but and GPA risk.

All evidence is in-person; recent reviews are far more positive than older ones.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is manageable with practice resources, yet several students rate difficulty high.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with participation mattering.

as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Exactly half the sample is enthusiastic while the other .

In-person only; and incomplete.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and practice-aligned tests help some, while others call him a .

Format shift

In-person polarized evidence.

Workload

Light

68/100

Positive reviews stress no homework if labs and practice are done; .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Half describe a hilarious caring teacher; half call the experience the .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Labs plus quizzes and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Chem 101 is a split experience: , and a caring vibe, while critics report grade delays and harsh outcomes.

Main concern

Grade posting delays and a large negative cluster that strongly warns others away.

What students said

“ and as long as you do the .”
101
“if you do your work it's an easy A.”
101
“He did not upload official grades in time by the deadline.”
101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and counting toward success.

Practice quizzes match examsLabs requiredTest heavy for some

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say practice quizzes and problems closely match real quizzes and tests.

Practice matches examsLabsQuizzes and tests
“The /tests.”
101
“practice problems often end up being exactly like the exams/quizzes.”
101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you do your work it's an easy A. Gives many resources for exams and quizzes”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise and strong warnings. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔀 Polarized Experience

48/100

“The . Not sure how he's allowed to teach anywhere.”

🎯 Practice-Aligned Tests

70/100

“practice problems often end up being exactly like the exams/quizzes.”

⚠️ Grade Posting Risk

25/100

“He did not upload official grades in time by the deadline.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is also pretty easy .
  • Great person and great professor.
  • The .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do your work it's an easy A.
  • and as long as you do the .
  • Save your mental health and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but extreme polarization and limited grade data reduce certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

1016 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2