AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Victor Abundez-Guerra

PHILM22 · PHIL110 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you can keep up with and handwritten work, because the teaching and grade value are both excellent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent lecturerClear and engagingEasy A with completionReading and handwriting requiredCaring and responsive
  • Students overwhelmingly praise him as , and genuinely helpful in making philosophy approachable.
  • Grades are very attainable because many assignments , and or relaxed grading appears often.
  • The main cost is steady reading, handwritten submissions, participation, and stricter late-work rules in some online sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

91/100

An A is highly realistic for students who submit the regular work on time because many , and relaxed grading.

Online reviews emphasize completion-based work and handwritten submissions, while , and relaxed grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

, but , and structure make the material easy to follow for most students.

In person reviews praise live discussion and , while online reviews still find the course accessible but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as universally strict, but participation and timely submissions matter for grades.

In-person reviews show participation and discussion are important, while online reviews focus more on daily or weekly deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and grade-friendly while still encouraging real thought.

, though online reviews include more complaints about workload rules and handwritten submissions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Many reviews describe completion credit, , and easy paths to an A despite occasional harsh essay grading.

Format shift

Online grading often rewards completion, while , and effort with relaxed standards.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

The work is steady with , and essays, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier because of handwritten PDF submissions and frequent deadlines, while and simple weekly tasks.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently praise his lectures, clarity, humor, care, and ability to make philosophy meaningful and understandable.

Format shift

In person reviews especially praise live engagement, while , and clear instructions.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear driven mainly by readings, , and participation rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize notes, discussions, quizzes, and essays, while in-person , and discussion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students describe him as , and discussion-friendly, with and participate.

Main concern

The still require effort despite an easy overall grade path.

What students said

“Show up, participate, and do the and you should do fine.”
PHIL110
“Philosophy can be hard to understand because it gets convoluted, but he really break it down into a way that could be well understood.”
2851

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly find the , and grade-friendly, though some dislike daily work, handwritten PDF submissions, and strict late-work rules.

Main concern

The main online concern is steady handwritten work and limited late-work flexibility in some sections.

What students said

“Super easy and straightforward class. so if you just get all assignments done you will have an A.”
PHIL110
“He doesn't accept late work at all and if you try to turn in late work he won't accept it at all”
PHIL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not prove strict proctoring or open-book exams, but assessment risk is low because grades and manageable quizzes or essays.

Completion-Based AssignmentsCredit or No Credit WorkShort QuizzesEssays Can Be Harsh

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person , and participation-based work, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Mini Weekly QuizzesMidterm and Final EssaysParticipation-Based Work
“made sure students were well prepped for .”
2851
“only two ~1000-1700 word essays, midterm and final.”
PHIL110

Online

, and essays, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, or open-book policies.

Credit or No Credit AssignmentsWeekly DiscussionsShort QuizzesEssays Can Be Harsh
“ so if you just get all assignments done you will have an A.”
PHIL110
“ but not too bad.”
PHIL110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Victor is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Philosophy can be hard to understand because it gets convoluted, but he really break it down into a way that could be well understood.”

📈 Easy A Value

91/100

“ so if you just get all assignments done you will have an A.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ if you can. He is a great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Abundez is a great speaker and is interesting to listen to which is important for an instructor.
  • Prof. Guerra makes the things he teaches easy to understand, even the harder topics.
  • Professor Victor is the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up, participate, and do the and you should do fine.
  • Super easy and straightforward class.
  • Do the work and you can get an A.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Rules

  • There is something due every day.
  • Only drawback is that and submitted online.
  • Assignments weekly but very doable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews across both formats are detailed and highly consistent, with only a few negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL11042 reviews
28515 reviews
PHILM222 reviews
3421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 15 · A 17 · A- 5

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4