AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Gwenyth Mapes

HUMANITIES110 · HUMAN110 · HUM110 · HU110 · HUM120 · HUM101 · 295 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
25.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless , and blunt feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderHeavy readingUnclear instructionsPassive aggressive feedbackHigh stress workload
  • Students repeatedly describe harsh grading and .
  • The workload is heavy for a lower-level humanities course, especially online.
  • A few students value the , but most warn strongly against taking her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A , and meeting very strict writing expectations.

Online reviews emphasize harsh feedback and , while and pop quiz pressure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The content may be introductory, but students say the , and analysis are made much harder than expected.

Online students report confusing modules and long videos, while and surprise quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, and participation are essential.

, while online reviews focus more on due dates and assignment expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students warn against taking her because the , and stressful.

Both formats contain strong avoid warnings, with online reviews sounding especially intense and frequent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call her a and instruction issues.

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both formats, with .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews describe lots of , and cumulative revisions.

Format shift

Online workload is described as hours of videos and weekly essays, while , and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students often , and a stressful tone despite some detailed guidance.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for and feedback, while , and strict expectations.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven mainly by papers, essays, discussions, reading work, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and discussions, while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but still lean negative, with frequent , and papers.

Main concern

, and exact writing expectations create a high-pressure classroom.

What students said

“The most stressful class I've ever had.”
110
“Umh, if you want an easy A .”
HUM110
“Be in class, on time, and with materials.”
HUM110

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and stressful feedback.

Main concern

online class risky.

What students said

“Expect to work hard for an A”
HUM110
“She assigned hours upon hours of videos, made everything so complicated when it didn't have to be, left long notes about everything you did wrong and made you feel stupid.”
110
“Mapes does not give clear instruction&belittles students when they submit "subpar" work.”
HUM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but and some tests.

Pop QuizzesTests MentionedWriting Heavy Assessments

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Pop QuizzesTests Mentioned
“There is a lot of reading done in this class and .”
HUM110
“The .”
HUM110

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She took every ounce of fun out of learning for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Her instructions on assignments are unclear/unspecific, but then you get paragraphs of .”

⚖️

8/100

“For a 100 level class, Mapes is INCREDIBLY picky and harsh in .”

📚 Workload

10/100

“She assigned hours upon hours of videos, made everything so complicated when it didn't have to be.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very .
  • She berated and belittled you in all the comments she .
  • Professor Mapes is very passionate about Humanties and she even takes it up a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect to work hard for an A
  • Umh, if you want an easy A .
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • The work is difficult and overloaded.
  • A LOT of .
  • Insane amount of reading and really random pop quizes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

295

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5110
4 out of 545
3 out of 538
2 out of 544
1 out of 558

Course coverage

HUM11021 reviews
11020 reviews
HU1103 reviews
1201 review
1701 review
Show 4 more courses
HUM1011 review
HUM1201 review
HUMAN1101 review
HUMANITIES1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 2

B range

8

B 7 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

23

Drop/Withdrawal 13 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2