AI Rate Professor

Communications

Rukiya Akua

COMM144 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you and minimal feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveConfusing instructionsTough graderLate gradingParticipation matters
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Online reviews are especially negative, with and group projects.
  • A few in-person students liked the social justice focus and engaging lectures, but negative experiences dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some students earned As, but the comments describe picky , and limited feedback.

Online evidence shows some easy work but harsher confusion, while and few second chances.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject matter can be manageable, but and long discussion posts make the course feel harder than the content itself.

Online reviews emphasize confusing logistics, while in-person reviews and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation and showing up appear important, and for missing class.

Both formats mention participation, but the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and harsh grading experiences.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and little chance to correct mistakes.

Format shift

Online reviews stress tough grading and low scores, while and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is not consistently heavy, but long discussion posts, group projects, and .

Format shift

Online reviews say the work itself can be easy, while and a time-limited assignment.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The dominant pattern is unclear , and students feeling unsupported.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as especially distant and disorganized, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mainly mention assignments, discussion posts, and a .

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based grading, with online reviews specifically mentioning a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split, with two positive lecture experiences but , and boring lectures.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching quality and .

What students said

“She never graded anything in a timely matter, did not make sense”
Comm-144
“She fosters such a fun and inviting environment!”
Comm-144
“She has the .”
Comm-144

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report distant communication, confusing copied instructions, and .

Main concern

The main concern is poor responsiveness and .

What students said

“ .”
Comm-144
“Most instructions were a nightmare to understand.”
Comm-144
“I have never had a worse experience in a course.”
Comm-144

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and the clearest assessment detail is an .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyGroup Project Final Mentioned Online

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews mention a group project as the final but do not .

Group Project FinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“There was a group project as ”
Comm-144

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never had a worse experience in a course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She doesn't , and hates teaching online”

⚖️

28/100

“She is super picky about her grading, literally will give a C grade just because.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has great lectures, a hilarious sense of humor, and she definitely knows her stuff.
  • her lectures are the most boring thing I've ever had to listen to

Theme 2

📩 About Communication

  • .
  • Impossible to reach, dropped me from the class without communication.
  • The professor is very distant.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Work

  • She gave full credit easily if you showed up and did the work.
  • she would not grade anything until the very end of the semester
  • Get .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews are detailed and mostly consistent, with equal online and in-person evidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

Comm-14414 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1