AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kristina Sundblad

MATH88 · MATH170 · MATH176 · MATH178 · MATH103 · MATH90 · COS103 · MATH090 · MATH180 · MATH175 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are comfortable with fast math lectures, active participation, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast Paced LecturesTest HeavyCaring but PolarizingGroup WorkTough Math
  • Reviews are sharply split between and caring and students who say she moves too fast and is hard to understand.
  • , and several students say homework or study guides do not fully protect grades.
  • Success depends heavily on attendance, asking questions early, keeping up with homework, and tolerating group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn A grades with effort and , but and make an A difficult.

In-person evidence dominates and , while online evidence is too sparse and conflicting to change the overall judgment.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is challenging and often taught quickly, making it easy to fall behind without steady study and questions.

, while the two online reviews give opposite impressions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many students say attendance and participation are necessary because missing class or falling behind quickly hurts performance.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance pressure, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

classes, but many others strongly warn against her pace and exams.

In-person reviews are split but detailed, while online reviews are too few and contradictory.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some reviews mention leniency, rounding, and , but , and homework with limited grade impact.

Format shift

and harsh exam complaints, while online evidence is too limited.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students often report lots of , and .

Format shift

, while one online review also tags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her teaching quality is polarizing, with many students praising clear help and many others .

Format shift

In-person evidence is deeply mixed, while online evidence is limited to one very positive and one very negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly say tests and , and group work supporting but not replacing exams.

Format shift

, while online assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong praise for helpfulness and clarity from some students but strong , and .

Main concern

Students can fall behind quickly because lectures move fast and .

What students said

“She goes super fast during the lectures and if you ask her to slow down she doesn't.”
MATH180
“She explained all the concepts thoroughly.”
MATH180
“Kristina is by far the hardest professor I've ever had in my college career but she's great.”
MATH178

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is too limited and conflicting, with one review calling her the and another saying she cannot teach online.

Main concern

Only two online reviews provide mixed and thin evidence.

What students said

“She doesnt know how to teach at all!”
MATH103
“She is the college.”
MATH88

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly describe hard, heavily weighted tests, pop quizzes, and .

Test HeavyDifficult ExamsPop Quizzes MentionedStudy Guides May Not Match

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyDifficult ExamsPop Quizzes MentionedStudy Guides May Not Match
“oh her study guides are nothing like the exams.”
MATH178
“Beware, the practice study guides.”
MATH180
“4 exams and .”
MATH178

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or test structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kristina is by far the hardest professor I've ever had in my college career but she's great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting split , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Sundblad is an incredibly good calculus teacher, who really does know how to answer questions in a way that ensures you can understand how or why it makes sense.”

⚠️ Pace And Exams

35/100

“She goes super fast during the lectures and if you ask her to slow down she doesn't.”

📚 Grade Difficulty

38/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained all the concepts thoroughly.
  • She talks about difficult subjects and concepts like we already understand them.
  • She can go through things fast, but will slow down if you ask.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tests and .
  • .
  • She makes it nearly impossible for anyone to get an A in her class.

Theme 3

🙋 About Participation

  • Attendance and participation is a MUST.
  • Key to success is answering questions and attend lectures.
  • Lectures are filled with group work where you iron down taught topics or realize how little you know.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 44 reviews cover many years and courses, though the online sample is very small and opinions are polarized.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 57
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH18017 reviews
MATH1037 reviews
MATH1785 reviews
MATH0904 reviews
MATH1704 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1762 reviews
MATH902 reviews
COS1031 review
MATH1751 review
MATH881 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 2