AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

June Yang

PHIL125 · PHIL116 · PHIL114 · PSY134 · PHIL118 · PHIL110INTRO · PHI110 · PHIL0000 · PHIL110 · PHIL130 · PHIL120 · LOGIC · 146 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
72.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a passionate philosophy teacher, but be cautious online unless you are ready for and strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational teacherCaring supportChallenging philosophyTough online gradingHeavy reading and writing
  • In-person students often describe Yang as one of and most caring professors.
  • Online reviews are much more divided, with , and .
  • The course can be rewarding, but it is not a low-effort A unless the format and student learning style fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

An A is very possible with effort, , and support, but tough grading and .

In-person reviews make the A feel more reachable through support and , while online and high effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Philosophy concepts are often abstract and challenging, though Yang can make them clearer in person.

, while online students more often feel left to decode difficult concepts alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

54/100

because students say missing class or skipping readings leads to confusion.

In-person evidence points to attendance being important for understanding, while but demanding independent work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and care, but online warnings lower the overall recommendation.

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, while online reviews split sharply between rewarding and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and effort-based to very strict, with helping offset tougher standards.

Format shift

and help, while online grading is repeatedly called tough and unclear.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students frequently mention lots of reading, writing, journals, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially demanding, while but often seen as more worthwhile.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

as inspiring and caring, but online delivery has serious consistency complaints.

Format shift

In-person evidence supports excellent teaching, while online evidence is mixed and sometimes strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Reviews emphasize , and some tests rather than a mostly exam-based course.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and writing, while , and occasional tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing engaging lectures, care, , office-hour help, and a meaningful learning experience.

Main concern

The material can be abstract and students need to read, attend, and think deeply.

What students said

“the course material is taught in a way that makes it impossible to misunderstand”
PHIL125
“ , and teaches students to think for themselves.”
PHIL110INTRO
“This course was a challenge to understand, but Yang does a great job in her lectures.”
PHIL110

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some students praising her care and feedback while , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly say expectations are hard to gauge and .

What students said

“For an Introduction Philosophy class she expects you to have the knowledge and comprehension of someone that majors in it.”
PHIL110
“Prof Yang was a wonderful professor.”
PHI110
“ .. she does not teach.”
PHIL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but mostly student-friendly where mentioned, including notecards and .

Written TestsNotecard AllowedOpen Book ExamsNotes AllowedSimple Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some open-book or notes-allowed exams, making exam risk moderate to friendly.

Written TestsNotecard AllowedOpen Book ExamsNotes Allowed
“ .”
PHI110
“What saved me were the small note cards you can bring to the exams and use as a cheat sheet.”
PHIL110
“She lets you use the and notes!”
PHIL114

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, webcam requirement, proctoring, open-book format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting format-specific patterns in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ , and teaches students to think for themselves.”

⚖️

48/100

“She is a , but it hardly matters as there are so many ways to get as well as the many resources to help you.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“15+ hours of work per week for only a 3 credit course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • june is an extremely intelligent and passionate professor & is very good at teaching.
  • Yang does a great job in her lectures.
  • Professor June is a life changing teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and abstract thinking in order to get full credit, but .
  • She has no .
  • By far the

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Zoom lectures felt like they were in person.
  • !
  • It is hard to gauge her expectations and completely grasp the material online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

146

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across online and : excellent in-person teaching and and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5112
4 out of 517
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHIL11016 reviews
PHIL12510 reviews
PHI1109 reviews
PHIL1183 reviews
PHIL1303 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PHIL1142 reviews
PHIL1202 reviews
LOGIC1 review
PHIL00001 review
PHIL110INTRO1 review
PHIL1161 review
PSY1341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 7 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2