AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Sharon Sampson

AOJ202 · AOJ110 · AOJ125 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
55.88%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle reading-heavy, repetitive work for a likely good grade, but if you need strong organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A potentialLots of readingExtra creditDisorganizedCaring but inconsistent
  • Many students earn high grades because of , and .
  • Workload can be repetitive and , and case assignments.
  • Student experiences are sharply split between caring and , and hard to reach.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

High grades are common and many students mention or easy quizzes, but the A , and tolerance for unclear grading.

Both formats show easy A potential, but online reviews while in-person AOJ202 reviews show heavier case work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is often straightforward and , but and organization issues make some sections feel harder than the concepts themselves.

Online and in-person reviews both describe manageable content, with in-person AOJ202 showing the strongest difficulty complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews say participation and showing up matter, but reviews do .

In-person reviews mention participation and class routines more clearly, while online reviews focus on modules and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and easy grades, but many warn against her disorganization, workload, and poor communication.

Both formats are mixed, with online reviews slightly more positive in recent AOJ110 sections and in-person reviews sharply negative for AOJ202.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Many students report easy grading, , and high grades, but others describe harsh or .

Format shift

Both formats include and high grades, but online reviews contain clearer complaints about flip-floppy or .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly readings, papers, discussions, quizzes, group work, and major risk.

Format shift

Online workload is repetitive and module-based, while in-person AOJ202 reviews describe the .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students praise her caring tone and feedback, but repeated , and weak communication hold the teaching score down.

Format shift

Online reviews often praise feedback but criticize organization, while poor teacher.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears driven mainly by weekly readings, papers, discussions, quizzes, case work, and .

Format shift

, and projects more than formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

AOJ110 and AOJ125 can be easy and caring, while AOJ202 is often criticized for , and stress.

Main concern

In-person concern centers on long , and uneven teaching quality.

What students said

“EASY A. She offers every week.”
AOJ110
“Insane amount of homework; cases every week that were at LEAST 40 pages”
AOJ202
“She doesn't teach.”
AOJ202

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews often report easy A potential, , and , but also disorganization, repetitive work, reading, papers, and some harsh grading complaints.

Main concern

Online students most , and reading-heavy weekly work.

What students said

“ and unnecessary, but easy A!”
AOJ110
“ and repetitive, relying heavily on reading and writing.”
AOJ110
“ .”
AOJ202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention weekly quizzes and projects, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or a .

Weekly QuizzesTwo Quiz AttemptsFinal ProjectPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, presentations, and tests with searchable answers, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesCase AssignmentsFinal ProjectPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Every week consists of one assignment & a 10-question quiz (2 attempts each quiz) that you can find the answers on the PowerPoint.”
AOJ110
“ ”
AOJ110

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, discussions, papers, and projects, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Weekly QuizzesDiscussion PostsFinal ProjectPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Every single week we had an assignment w/ 5 questions, a 10-question discussion board &a short quiz . and unnecessary, but easy A!”
AOJ110
“A regular week had 2 discussions, 1 assignment, and 1 quiz with a requirement of 2 responses for each discussion.”
AOJ110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“EASY A. She offers every week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting the split , and organization problems. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“EASY A. She offers every week.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“ and repetitive, relying heavily on reading and writing.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ . Unfortunately, that is the only thing going for her.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“Most of the negative reviews about this professor are confusing to me; she accommodates you and !”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and unnecessary, but easy A!
  • EASY A. She offers every week.
  • Her class is an easy A; each case she covers is interesting, and I always looked forward to them.
  • , and very UNDERSTANDING.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Organization

  • and repetitive, relying heavily on reading and writing.
  • Insane amount of homework; cases every week that were at LEAST 40 pages
  • Her amount of .
  • Sometimes felt that and not worded well.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor !
  • Seemed like she cared about her students, sent many inspirational announcements & she sounds really sweet.
  • She really cares about the students.
  • She will not accommodate you. She will not help you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 34 reviews across online and to show consistent strengths and recurring risks.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

AOJ11021 reviews
AOJ20210 reviews
AOJ1253 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 10 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 7

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1