AI Rate Professor

Media Arts

Jeanette Calo

MCOMM110112 · MCOM110 · MCOM132A · MCOM210 · MCOM1129638 · MCOMM110 · MCOM112 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
78.95%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging and useful media course and can handle steady writing-heavy work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesStrong feedbackHeavy but useful workFair gradingStudent-centered
  • Students strongly praise her energy, humor, experience, and and journalism students.
  • The class , and assignments, especially online.
  • Grades are generally fair and achievable when students keep up, but this is not always a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

High grades are common and , but students often say the A requires keeping up with substantial writing and weekly work.

Online evidence shows a wider workload split, while participate and do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students often find the and the concepts approachable, but the amount of reading and writing keeps it from being effortless.

In-person reviews sound more beginner-friendly and engaging, while online .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance and participation appear to matter in some in-person classes, but reviews do not prove a .

and participation, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and weekly assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend her because she is engaging, experienced, fair, responsive, and .

Both formats are mostly recommended, but online reviews include more workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Students , and passing if the work is completed, but not automatic high grades.

Format shift

and no late work, while in-person reviews emphasize fair expectations and participation.

Workload

Moderate

43/100

The workload is often manageable but can be heavy, especially with , and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest workload complaints, while courses.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and and engagement.

Format shift

In-person reviews are consistently enthusiastic, while online reviews are mostly strong but include a few older complaints about organization and communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears balanced across papers, discussions, quizzes, presentations, projects, assignments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers, assignments, discussions, and tests, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

structure, useful field knowledge, and fair expectations.

Main concern

Students should expect participation, attendance, presentations, quizzes, or steady work rather than a passive class.

What students said

“Couldn't have had a better class to introduce my major.”
MCOM112
“ ! .”
MCOM112
“There was, however, a tremendous amount of work to keep up with to pass both classes.”
MCOMM110112

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and responsiveness, though several students warn the workload can be heavy.

Main concern

The main online concern is a large amount of .

What students said

“Easily the and .”
MCOM110
“this is the heaviest work load for a class I have ever had in my life.”
MCOM112
“She is responsive to problems, even in an 8-week online course”
MCOM210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The comments mention quizzes, tests, papers, and presentations, but do not clearly prove open-book, take-home, proctoring, or .

Quizzes MentionedTests MentionedPapers MentionedPresentations MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention presentations, quizzes, essays, worksheets, and participation, but do not clearly prove a .

Presentation MentionedQuizzes MentionedEssay Mentioned
“You are going to have a short presentation one day infront of the class but shes super cool about it.”
MCOM112
“a lot of but she gave us a PDF for it so that was cool.”
MCOMM110

Online

Online reviews mention tests, papers, discussion work, and assignment scheduling, but do not clearly .

Tests MentionedPapers MentionedDiscussion Boards
“Doesn't waste time with superfluous quizzes and and papers.”
MCOM112
“The only tough part was finding a related article to post for the .”
MCOM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is knowledgeable, has a ton of experience in the field, and made this class a breeze if you put in the work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“10/10 recommend this teacher!”

📚 Workload Reality

43/100

“this class is 80% of my classwork out of 4 classes, it's a lot especially if you are not majoring in journalism.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She used Kahoot as a way to keep us engaged and excited to learn.
  • Professor Calo is awesome. .
  • She is knowledgeable, has a ton of experience in the field, and made this class a breeze if you put in the work.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There was, however, a tremendous amount of work to keep up with to pass both classes.
  • She does somewhat assign a lot of work, which is a little tedious but still pretty easy.
  • Not an easy A, but if you want to work in the media industry.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is responsive to problems, even in an 8-week online course
  • Straight forward professor who respects her students.
  • A baddie who cares about your success in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is credible because 19 reviews span many years, formats, and courses with mostly consistent praise plus repeated workload warnings.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MCOM11210 reviews
MCOM1103 reviews
MCOMM1102 reviews
MCOM11296381 review
MCOM132A1 review
Show 2 more courses
MCOM2101 review
MCOMM1101121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1