AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daniel Greenheck

MATH280 · MAT170 · MATH178 · MATH281 · MATH120 · MAT160 · MATH180 · MATH175 · CALC178 · 187 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
67.83%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend, ask questions, and keep up with homework, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHeavy homeworkTough examsHelpful in office hoursFormat-dependent experience
  • , and willingness to help.
  • Online students report , and serious frustration with communication and AI accusations.
  • The class can reward effort, but unclear steps, fast pacing, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic with and participation, but it is not low-effort because exams and .

In-person evidence suggests effort is rewarded, while online and higher risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The math content is often manageable with help, but fast pacing, skipped steps, and .

In-person students report more support, while online students more often describe , and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as strictly mandatory, but students say showing up and engaging are important to succeed.

In-person reviews stress attending and asking questions, while online and grading.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

He is recommended mainly for in-person students who value support, but online reviews create a major warning.

, while online sentiment is often strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some students mention , and , but online students repeatedly call him tough or harsh.

Format shift

as flexible, while online grading is often described as rigid and picky.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but online students describe it as more overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

Most in-person students praise his clarity and care, but some students say lectures can be fast, messy, or .

Format shift

Teaching experience is strong in person but inconsistent and often criticized online.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and finals, with exams carrying meaningful risk.

Format shift

, and exams, while online reviews emphasize homework, quizzes, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and clearer help when students participate.

Main concern

The main risk is fast or messy lectures paired with and .

What students said

“Very helpful and .”
MAT170
“There is a lot of hw but you need it if you want to understand better.”
MATH175
“ because you are teaching yourself the material and never know what to expect.”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply negative overall, with , and AI-related conflicts.

Main concern

Students say and workload can feel overwhelming.

What students said

“The workload feels overwhelming, especially for students who work full time.”
MAT170
“ .”
CALC178
“You must show your work the way that HE WANTS to see it.”
MATH178

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but sometimes flexible math exams, with one in-person review mentioning a notes page and .

Tough ExamsOne Page Notes AllowedDropped Or Replaced Exam MentionedQuizzes And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one-page notes, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Tough ExamsOne Page Notes AllowedRegular Exams And Final
“allows 1 page notes on exam.”
MATH280
“regular 4 exams and final. weekly quizzes.”
176
“the ”
MATH178

Online

Online reviews mention tests and exams but do not clearly prove .

Tests And QuizzesStrict Work Format
“You must show your work the way that HE WANTS to see it.”
MATH178
“loads you up with so .”
MATH178

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students can really thrive in his class if you stay active and engaged.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

73/100

“Very helpful and .”

⚖️

58/100

“ , and grades generously”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Be prepared for ALOT of work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy to understand.
  • Lectures can be because he moves fast and sometimes skips steps.
  • Very good at explaining concepts, especially in office hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you put in the work you will get a good grade.
  • The work may be hard but the support is there.
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • The workload feels overwhelming, especially for students who work full time.
  • He accused me of using AI, and I never have.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

187

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across recent years give strong credibility, with and repeated themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5114
4 out of 520
3 out of 58
2 out of 513
1 out of 533

Course coverage

MATH17810 reviews
MATH1809 reviews
MATH2817 reviews
MAT1606 reviews
MATH1755 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MAT1704 reviews
CALC1783 reviews
MATH2803 reviews
1762 reviews
math1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 11 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 4

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1