AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Mary Courtney

CD120 · LANGUAGELIT · 2014FACD1252560 · CD132133 · CD · CDSECT · CD125 · CD132 · CD129 · FIELDEXPCD · CD121 · CHILDDEVEL125 · CD174 · CD130 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you have a lot of time, strong independence, and tolerance for heavy work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadDisorganizedTough gradingUnclear instructionsRequires self-teaching
  • Many students describe the workload as , and observation projects.
  • A frequent complaint , and limited guidance.
  • Some students respect her knowledge and , but the overall recommendation tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it requires large amounts of , and sustained weekly effort.

Both formats require heavy effort, with online reviews stressing constant assignments and and major projects.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The content may not always be conceptually hard, but , and heavy projects make the course difficult to manage.

Online reviews emphasize textbook-based self-teaching, while and disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, though some in-person Saturday courses and participation requirements reduce flexibility.

Online evidence focuses on , while in-person evidence mentions Saturday attendance and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because the , and directions feel unfair or overwhelming.

Both formats are mostly negative, though a small number of older reviews in each format describe her as fair or knowledgeable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students frequently call her a and say small mistakes, unclear criteria, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress strict grading on assignments and final papers, while and lost or .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

The workload is repeatedly described as excessive, with many assignments, papers, readings, and .

Format shift

Online reviews cite weekly assignment overload, while , and time-consuming class demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Her subject knowledge is acknowledged by some students, but many describe her teaching as , and dependent on self-teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize lack of lectures and textbook reliance, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, quizzes, discussions, and , while , and major projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also report heavy workload, disorganization, slow grading, and .

Main concern

The main risk is a demanding workload paired with and .

What students said

“The workload was heavy for how little guidance was given.”
CD125
“There was a lot of work but the couple.”
CD129

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing extreme , and tough grading.

Main concern

The online class can feel like self-teaching through heavy assignments with limited lecture support.

What students said

“She didn't lecture once and .”
CD125
“On average there are about 15 assigns. every week”
CD125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment risk appears , and projects than proctored exams.

Quizzes MentionedEssay Tests MentionedFinal PaperObservation ProjectNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book status, proctoring, or a consistent exam format.

Essay TestsObservation ProjectFinal Assignment
“ but she gives a study guide for them.”
LANGUAGELIT
“The understand how to do the final.”
CD125

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, and a , but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or .

QuizzesFinal PaperSeparate Website
“The class assignments, quizzes, and ”
CD125
“the and her directions make no sense.”
CD125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want clarity or organization.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

8/100

“I have had 16 week courses with less work than she has posted for the first week.”

⚖️

22/100

“if you make one error, she .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“It felt like we had to figure everything out alone.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • I wish I had dropped her class at the start of the semester because she gives a ridiculous amount of homework.
  • My assignments were 25 hours a week.
  • If you want 30 assignments a week, this is your professor

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • This course was due to unclear instructions.
  • This Professor is super unorganized, does not deliver information well and is one of the .
  • She is extremely unorganized, NEVER has your work returned in a timely manner

Theme 3

⚖️

  • She's a and .
  • .
  • Good teacher, not a and you have to ask for her to find them!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years and both formats show repeated patterns of heavy workload, disorganization, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 513
2 out of 57
1 out of 517

Course coverage

CD12524 reviews
CD1297 reviews
CD1307 reviews
CD2 reviews
2014FACD12525601 review
Show 9 more courses
CD1201 review
CD1211 review
CD1321 review
CD1321331 review
CD1741 review
CDSECT1 review
CHILDDEVEL1251 review
FIELDEXPCD1 review
LANGUAGELIT1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3