AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Erin Smith

ANTH130 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if available, but be cautious with online sections because the only online review is strongly negative.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate lecturesField tripPoor online responseAI accusation riskFormat split
  • The two reviews conflict sharply, with one excellent in-person experience and one very negative online experience.
  • , and a memorable field trip.
  • Online evidence warns , and failing an assignment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

The +, but the online reviewer failed after an AI accusation, so the A path depends heavily on format and .

, while online evidence shows a serious failure risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The in-person class sounds engaging and manageable, but the online class is described as hard and communication issues.

In-person evidence is positive, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on format because the , while the online review says not to take her.

The , while the online review strongly discourages taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The online review reports an F tied to an AI accusation, while the concern.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests strict grading risk, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The reviews do not give enough workload detail beyond one online complaint and one positive in-person experience.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching appears excellent in person but poor online, based on one review per format.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised as passionate and engaging, while online teaching is criticized for poor responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The online tags say test heavy and graded by few things, but the limited comments do not fully detail assessment structure.

Format shift

Only the online review provides assessment-method clues, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and describes an engaging, passionate professor with a free zoo field trip.

Main concern

There , so evidence is limited.

What students said

“she was an amazing professor.”
ANTH130
“She is clearly passionate and it makes everyone excited and engaged in the class.”
ANTH130
“You even get to go to the Zoo for free for a field trip!”
ANTH130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative and , and an F.

Main concern

The and slow communication.

What students said

“ and grades late.”
ANTH130
“Will accuse you of AI giving you an ”
ANTH130
“ if you want to pass.”
ANTH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring rules, open-book status, Lockdown Browser use, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or .

Online

The online review tags the class as test heavy but does not .

Test HeavyGraded by Few Things

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if available, but be cautious with online sections because the only online review is strongly negative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“she was an amazing professor.”

⚠️ Online Risk

30/100

“ if you want to pass.”

👍 In-Person Strength

50/100

“She is clearly passionate and it makes everyone excited and engaged in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is clearly passionate and it makes everyone excited and engaged in the class.
  • and grades late.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Risk

  • Will accuse you of AI giving you an
  • if you want to pass.

Theme 3

❤️

  • .
  • You even get to go to the Zoo for free for a field trip!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, split evenly by format and giving completely opposite experiences.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH1302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values