AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susana Munoz

MATH9519 · MATH280 · MAT120 · MATH160 · MATH176 · MATH103 · MATH090 · MATH110 · MATH180 · PRECAL176 · MATH298 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.83%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you are willing to attend, do the homework, and ask for help, but if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear when organizedHeavy homeworkPolarizing attitudeAttendance mattersTough tests
  • Students and rude or confusing classroom experiences.
  • Getting a strong grade is possible, but , and .
  • Workload and grading feel inconsistent, with , and strict point loss.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say the A , and steady studying rather than minimal effort.

Online evidence is split between easy completion and self-teaching, while and doing the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is manageable when her explanations are clear, but fast pacing and students.

Online sections can feel easier for independent learners, while and classroom interaction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Many reviews say attendance, notes, tutoring, or participation are required or strongly tied to passing.

Online reviews emphasize notes and participation, while grades.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and effort-based grading, but many others strongly warn about attitude, pacing, and grading.

Online recommendations are mixed, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and , but many students call her tough, unfair, or strict about small mistakes.

Format shift

Online reviews include both full-credit and harsh-grading claims, while and strict expectations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and activities are mentioned often enough to make the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

Online students mention weekly assignments and Pearson work, while and lecture-heavy pacing.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

, but negative reviews describe confusing lectures, mistakes, sarcasm, and poor support.

Format shift

Online teaching depends more on self-study materials, while and discouraging lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

59/100

Reviews , and notes, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize Pearson assignments and tests, while , and occasional projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but major inconsistency in pacing, attitude, workload, and .

Main concern

The biggest risk is a rude or discouraging.

What students said

“Her lectures are very thorough and she makes everything very easy to understand.”
MATH160
“She goes through the lesson really quickly so its hard to grasp the lesson well.”
MATH180
“Do not think this is an easy A though. You MUST show up and do the work/study.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising structure and support while others say the class requires self-teaching and heavy Pearson work.

Main concern

Online students may need , and Pearson assignments.

What students said

“This class is entirely what you make of it.”
MATH160
“ if you love to learn on your own and watch 20+ year old videos that barely correspond to the lecture.”
MATH160
“Even though I did well, looking back it .”
MATH176

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show regular tests and finals with mixed study-guide support, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Tests Every Few ModulesStudy Guides VaryTest HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some sections, quizzes, and finals, but exam security rules are not clearly proven.

Test HeavyStudy Guides VaryFinal Review Mentioned
“ .”
MATH160
“You are tested about every other week but she gives out study guides very similar to the tests.”
MATH176
“Go to the ! most of the problems on the .”
MATH160

Online

Online reviews mention tests and missing study guides, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Tests Every Few ModulesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“She assigns 2-3 homework assignments per week and a .”
MATH160
“No study guides for the exams and its .”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not think this is an easy A though. You MUST show up and do the work/study.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Her lectures are very thorough and she makes everything very easy to understand.”

⚖️

50/100

“ . .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Prof Munoz doesn't have an "easy" class. But she is a good prof. She just gives a ton of assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All of the material is explained well.
  • She goes through the lesson really quickly so its hard to grasp the lesson well.
  • She constantly makes mistakes while teaching and confuses you real bad.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you show up to class and listen to the lectures, there is no way you will fail.
  • Not an easy A.
  • She makes your work for your grade, and that is the greatest blessing as a student.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Tone

  • and flexible.
  • Condescending and rude to her students.
  • Shes passive aggressive if youre struggling

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 47 reviews span many years, formats, and courses with detailed but polarized patterns.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 510
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH16021 reviews
MATH1767 reviews
MATH2985 reviews
MATH1804 reviews
MATH0902 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH1032 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MAT1201 review
MATH2801 review
MATH95191 review
PRECAL1761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3