AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Brian Mark

ESL106 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Only take Mark if you want rigorous writing practice and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing reviewsHeavy homeworkTough gradingWriting feedbackNot beginner friendly
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who see major writing improvement and students who strongly warn against the class.
  • The workload is heavy, with , and revision time.
  • Several students complain about tough or , and confusion for new international students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

High grades are possible, but students describe , and significant time demands.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Academic writing , and self-direction.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Reviews do not prove a , but one student says class ran long and another says there was no motivation to attend.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Recommendation depends heavily on student fit, because praise for feedback and improvement is balanced .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple students call him a tough or , though and improvement focus.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly , and major time demands.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

52/100

Some students call him caring and effective, but , and poor fit for new students.

Format shift

All and is highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, projects, revisions, reading, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students praising improvement and feedback while , and avoidance-level frustration.

Main concern

New or support-dependent students may struggle with , and .

What students said

“ , so many projects requires a lot of time to complete.”
ESL106
“If you actually want to improve your English and .”
ESL106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and projects, and they .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects but do not clearly prove any quiz, midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“so .”
ESL106
“A lot of .”
ESL106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ , and always willing to help.”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“ , so many projects requires a lot of time to complete.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This was honestly one of the .
  • Hell no Dont ever never take class with professor his teaching not understanding so do not waste your time guys
  • He is a hard professor but he is a good professor at the same time.

Theme 2

📝

  • Really good class with
  • , asking me questions instead of .
  • Great Professor ! He's a little bit tough in grading but definitely gives a

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Fit

  • lots of , so .
  • A lot of .
  • If you actually want to improve your English and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years provide strong evidence, though the opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESL10611 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

4

C 4

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1