AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andrea Steel

MATH175 · MATH160 · MATH9445 · STATS160 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can attend consistently, keep up with fast lectures, and use homework and to protect your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditFast-Paced LecturesCaring When EngagedTest HeavyMixed Teaching Clarity
  • and online reviews.
  • Grades can be doable with , and , but tests carry major weight.
  • Students disagree sharply on teaching quality, especially lecture clarity and pace.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A , and , but tests and fast pacing keep it from being easy.

Online evidence is more favorable because it mentions videos and , while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for some students but , and test-centered.

Online students describe the pace as manageable with videos, while as .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and engagement are important or required for passing.

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Recommendations are split because supportive older reviews conflict with and exams.

, but and recently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and late flexibility help, but and some students call her a tough grader.

Format shift

Online reviews mention clearly, while and tough grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and projects appear regularly, but the workload is not described as overwhelming by most positive reviews.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on lecture preparation and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is described as caring and helpful by many students, but , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while and recently much weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly describe tests as a major part of the grade, with , and as support.

Format shift

Both formats mention lectures and , but in-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with older praise for help and but recent complaints , and attendance pressure.

Main concern

Recent students report , and test-heavy grading.

What students said

“It's pretty much a .”
MATH160
“She constantly gets her own worksheets wrong and .”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive and , and .

Main concern

Lectures can move fast if students do not watch the posted videos first.

What students said

“Professor Steel was an amazing professor.”
MATH160
“She does go kind of fast when it comes to her lectures but its only because she assumes you have watched the videos she provides on the topic.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and review support, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyExtra CreditPractice Review

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as important and sometimes difficult, but do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Test HeavyReview HelpsExtra Credit
“ but as long as and learning methods you will be good!”
MATH175
“ if you pay attention to the review lettuce.”
MATH9445

Online

Online reviews mention an exam and but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Extra Credit On Exam
“For our class she gave the whole class 5 extra points on an because.”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She constantly gets her own worksheets wrong and .”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“Offers to replace lowest test near the end of the course.”

👍 Recommendation Split

56/100

“Stats is not an easy class but !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just does worksheets in front of the class and does all the problems herself.
  • Absolutely phenomenal professor.
  • and really tries to go out of her way to help students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • Much for the .
  • Don't be lazy and you'll have no problem.

Theme 3

🧭 And Pace

  • missing class=missing lectures.
  • It's pretty much a .
  • She does go kind of fast when it comes to her lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across several years provide rich but time-sensitive evidence, with .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH16014 reviews
MATH1752 reviews
MATH94451 review
STATS1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C- 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1