AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patrick Monaghan

CHILD125 · CD173 · CD283 · CD181 · CD127 · CD131 · CD125 · CD129 · CD121 · ARTSCD · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle a , and tolerate uneven grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherTough graderHands-on classesVague instructionsCan be engaging
  • Students are sharply split between fun, caring, hands-on teaching and .
  • Grades can be manageable or easy in some courses, but and .
  • All analyzed reviews are in person, so there is no online-format evidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earned A grades and some call the class easy, but , and papers keep it from being effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course content is often described as easy, hands-on, or chill, but structure and .

All course-easiness evidence is from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Some reviews say you do not have to attend, while others warn that participation or skipping class affects success.

and varies by course.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendations are split because some students find him caring and fun while and disrespectful interactions.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

some courses but repeated complaints about tough, unfair, or .

Format shift

and varies strongly by course.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload ranges from easy assignments and , and .

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person and appears course-dependent.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can be engaging, creative, and caring, but many students report vague instructions, poor organization, and condescending responses.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and the reviews are highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, online , and finals, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is in person and changes by course.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

from fun and easy to unclear, tough, and disrespectful.

Main concern

The main risk is vague instructions combined with tough or .

What students said

“ , but .”
CD129
“Honestly, this class is an easy A if you buy the textbook and read it.”
CD125
“No actual teaching goes on in class - very fun to do art experiences in class though.”
CD121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with , and some courses described as having no tests.

Online TestsOpen Book With Book MentionedTake-Home FinalNo Tests In One Course

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention online tests using the book, a , and at least one course with no tests.

Online TestsOpen Book With Book MentionedTake-Home FinalNo Tests In One Course
“All of the so you can use the book which means you should get an A .”
CD125
“ . .”
CD129
“ and hard.”
CD125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He is great, he is chill. His sense of humor is not common, but you can get use to it.”

⚖️

45/100

“He expects for you to know what he wants and grades accordingly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

55/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes his work alot of fun, and you can tell he takes alot of pride in wha the does.
  • No actual teaching goes on in class - very fun to do art experiences in class though.
  • He is fun, creative, and open-minded.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Difficulty & Grades

  • Honestly, this class is an easy A if you buy the textbook and read it.
  • and .
  • Easy. Grades easy.

Theme 3

📋 About Organization

  • Gave vague instructions for projects and assignments.
  • .
  • No announcements when assignments were available or due, provided a calendar then changed all the start/end dates without telling anyone.

Theme 4

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • and gets that life sometimes comes first.
  • He belittles his students if you don't agree with him, or if he does not agree with you.
  • He makes you feel stupid when you ask questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one in-person reviews across many years give rich, repeated, and course-specific evidence despite polarized opinions.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CD12112 reviews
CD1255 reviews
CD2835 reviews
CD1274 reviews
1213 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CD1813 reviews
CD1292 reviews
CD1312 reviews
1271 review
1311 review
ARTSCD1 review
CD1731 review
CHILD1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 11

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1