AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Leila Parello

PHIL125 · PHILTHIN · PHIL130LOGIC · PHIL111 · PHIL103 · PHIL125SUMMER · PHI125 · PHILOSOPHY125 · PHILO102A · PHIL150 · PHIL110 · PHIL130 · HUMANBEINGAES · PHIL6734 · PHILO150 · LOGIC · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her only if and and uneven organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesKind but disorganizedReading heavyFair gradingMixed recommendations
  • Students often describe her as kind and knowledgeable but .
  • Grades can be attainable with effort, reading, and submitted work.
  • Online reviews are more recent and more positive, while and lecture clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is realistic when students complete the reading and writing, but the workload and grade.

Online reviews support a manageable A through steady work, while but more confusion.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The philosophy content is not always intellectually extreme, but , and .

Online students call the course easier but time-heavy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important in several in-person reviews, but .

In-person reviews mention attendance more often, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Students recommend her when they value kindness and fair grading, but because the .

Online recommendation is more favorable, while and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

as fair or easy when work is submitted, though some students mention missing or .

Format shift

Online reviews lean toward clear grading and attainable grades, while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and short-term courses with compressed work.

Format shift

Online short courses are especially homework-heavy, while and writing.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She is often seen as kind and knowledgeable, but many students .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed but kinder, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and writing more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews cite discussions and writing assignments, while , and occasional tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with repeated complaints that and a .

Main concern

The main concern is unclear, disorganized lecturing that leaves students relying on the book.

What students said

“Her lectures are and often goes off topic.”
PHIL111
“Most of the time you can't comprehend what she is trying to teach you.”
PHIL125

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually found the class manageable or easy if they kept up with and assignments.

Main concern

The and homework in short online terms.

What students said

“It'd be hard to get a low grade in this class as long as you do most of the work.”
PHI125
“The workload is heavy and can be hard to balance if you're working full-time.”
PHIL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, study guides, and easy quizzes, but they do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyStudy guides mentionedTests mentioned in some in-person reviewsEasy quizzes mentioned online

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Study guides mentionedTests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“Study guides are important for tests.”
PHI125
“ if you study.”
PHIL130LOGIC

Online

Online reviews mention easy quizzes once but do not clearly .

Easy quizzes mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“Lots of . Easy quizzes.”
PHIL125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very sweet and willing to help, but her teaching style is a bit too unstructured for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

42/100

“Very difficult to follow along in her lectures, not because of the subject, but because of the way she lectures.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“The workload is heavy and can be hard to balance if you're working full-time.”

⚖️

66/100

“She is a , if you do your work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are and often goes off topic.
  • She talks in circles and never makes a .
  • Ms. Parello made the class interesting, I love listening to her lectures.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Grade depends on effort
  • There is a lot of information to read about, but don't get scared.
  • It'd be hard to get a low grade in this class as long as you do most of the work.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The professor is very kind and caring and helps students out a lot.
  • She is very sweet and willing to help.
  • She is a truly intelligent and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

58

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 517
1 out of 516

Course coverage

PHIL12514 reviews
PHI12510 reviews
LOGIC4 reviews
PHIL1304 reviews
PHIL1504 reviews
Show 11 more courses
PHIL1103 reviews
PHIL1112 reviews
HUMANBEINGAES1 review
PHIL1031 review
PHIL125SUMMER1 review
PHIL130LOGIC1 review
PHIL67341 review
PHILO102A1 review
PHILO1501 review
PHILOSOPHY1251 review
PHILTHIN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1