AI Rate Professor

Art

Sandra Wascher

ART104 · ART100 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
39.47%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if , and self-directed work for a usually attainable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLecture heavyExtra creditUnclear feedbackPolarizing teaching style
  • Older in-person reviews often describe an easy A with notes, notecards, and .
  • Recent reviews are much , and passive-aggressive interactions.
  • The course can produce high grades, but the experience depends heavily on tolerance for lectures, opinions, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades and helps, but recent and unclear expectations make the A cost more effort than expected.

In-person evidence has many older easy-A comments, while online evidence more often warns that and unclear.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The art content is generally introductory, but long , and research can make it feel harder.

good notes, while online reviews describe more self-teaching and research.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because quizzes and and participation often matters.

, while online reviews focus more on keeping up with changing assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is weak because students are sharply divided between praising her passion and , and classroom tone.

Online recommendation is lower due to , while in-person reviews are polarized across older praise and newer complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Despite many A grades and , frequent comments about tough grading, point deductions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews report stricter and less transparent grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Work usually includes lectures, quizzes or tests, projects, papers, notes, and , with some students calling it easy and others overloaded.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly homework and research more often, while , quizzes, and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as passionate and knowledgeable, but recent reviews cite boring , and uncomfortable interactions.

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative about feedback and organization, while and classroom style.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments combine quizzes or tests, projects, essays, discussions, participation, field trips, and .

Format shift

Online sections emphasize assignments, projects, papers, and quizzes, while trips, and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and recent complaints about attitude, lecture boredom, mandatory notes, and tough grading.

Main concern

, and note taking matter, and recent students report a harsher classroom climate.

What students said

“Attendance is mandatory or ask for someone's notes if you are ever absent because .”
ART100
“The easiest class I've taken.”
ART100
“A very passive aggressive professor and isn't welcoming”
ART100

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with high grades but repeated complaints , and weak feedback.

Main concern

Students often feel they must interpret expectations alone and .

What students said

“ .”
ART100
“ , and many opportunities.”
ART100
“This class is self taught”
ART104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by section, with some student-friendly notecards or and some complaints about difficult or poorly worded tests.

QuizzesFew TestsTake-Home QuizzesNotecard AllowedExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, exams, notecards, and or standard closed-book rules.

Take-Home QuizzesNotecard AllowedThree ExamsLecture Notes Tested
“There was a total of 3 take home "quizzes," ”
ART100
“you are allowed to have a ”
ART100
“identify images, fill in the blank, multiple choice, and a essay question.”
ART100

Online

and projects, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Few QuizzesNo Test In Some SectionsProjects And Paper
“ , and many opportunities.”
ART100
“There were a total of four quizzes and 2 projects for this online class.”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Got an A in the class but had to work for it which is lame considering this is supposed to be an intro to art appreciation, not AP art analysis.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

35/100

“Grades responses critically to the T.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is by far one of the most passionate teachers I have met.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

45/100

“Recommend, but if so.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • , but and class was an easy GE.
  • yet grades it so harshly
  • If you work hard in her class and maintain good grades she will 100% help you get the A

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are extremely long (for no reason).
  • She is so passionate about art!
  • Heavy ranting usually before or in middle of lecture that made the class seem to go on forever.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • randomly changes the dates of things too often so its hard to keep track of when things are due
  • .
  • The whole class is powerpoint orientated and she provides you with a study guide for each unit.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews span many years and formats, with enough detail to show a real shift from older praise to recent criticism.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ART10048 reviews
ART1042 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 14 · A 15 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1