AI Rate Professor

Art

William Mosley

ARTD2 · ART230 · ARTPAINTING1 · 2DDRAWING · ART120 · 2D · ART124 · ART121 · 2DDESIGN · ART1202082 · ART2D · PAINT1 · PNT1 · ART1202D · 2DEMDESIGN · ART281 · ART122 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless , and comfortable working hard from vague project expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsTime-consuming projectsStrict classroom rulesTough gradingPassionate but polarizing
  • Students are sharply divided, but negative reviews repeatedly cite vague instructions, limited help, strict rules, and poor communication.
  • The workload is often project-heavy and creativity or required excessive effort.
  • Students who already like art, show up, follow directions exactly, and work independently have the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Some students earned A grades, but many say projects require major time, exact compliance, strong effort, and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content may be basic art work, but , and heavy time demands make the class feel challenging.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple reviews say attendance, punctuality, participation, phone rules, and staying in class are strictly enforced.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Many students advise avoiding him because they felt unsupported, confused, overworked, or unfairly graded despite some positive praise from serious art students.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Reviews often describe tough or , and grades based on exact expectations or effort that students did not always understand.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

23/100

Projects are repeatedly described as tedious, time-consuming, and demanding, with several students saying they required unreasonable hours.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students value his passion and experience, but many say he , and does not teach techniques clearly.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The course appears dominated by art projects and class participation, with only rare mentions of quizzes or exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a polarizing art professor whose passion and experience help some students but , and grading frustrate many others.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear instruction combined with , and difficult A-level grading.

What students said

“The and has an unreasonable amount of time to finish them.”
ART1202D
“Late or miss class 3 times your OUT!”
ART1202D
“He is passionate about art and you can tell by his lectures.”
ART120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews focus on projects, with only scattered mentions of quizzes or a final and .

Projects DominateFew Quizzes MentionedFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book, or consistent exam rules because most assessment comments focus on projects.

Projects DominateFew Quizzes MentionedFinal Mentioned
“6 projects throughout the semester -invest TIME on them if you want a good grade.”
120
“Told and that the ”
ART2D
“2 quizzes fairly easy.”
120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unspecified instructions and so you're flying blind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Does not teach anything and tells students to refer to the course outline for ALL relavent data.”

⚖️

24/100

“Getting an A is almost impossible unfairly destroyed my 4.0 GPA.”

📚 Workload Pressure

23/100

“This class required a lot of if you work a lot outside of class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The and are a huge pain to with.
  • He is passionate about art and you can tell by his lectures.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • can get an A if you want to work hard for it...don't expect a lot of help
  • art teacher.
  • The harder you work in his eyes the better the grade

Theme 3

📏 About Rules & Structure

  • Does not tolerate phone usage during lectures.
  • Late or miss class 3 times your OUT!
  • Leave your phone in your pocket though, seriously.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 50 in-person reviews over many years with recurring detailed themes about , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 511
3 out of 520
2 out of 516
1 out of 519

Course coverage

ART12014 reviews
ART1247 reviews
2D4 reviews
ART2D4 reviews
1203 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ART1202D3 reviews
2DDESIGN2 reviews
ART1212 reviews
12020821 review
2DDRAWING1 review
2DEMDESIGN1 review
ART12020821 review
ART1221 review
ART2301 review
ART2811 review
ARTD21 review
ARTPAINTING11 review
PAINT11 review
PNT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1