AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Working

MATH280 · MATH170180 · MATH176 · MATH170 · MATH115 · MATH090 · TRIG170 · MATH110 · MATH180 · 190 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend consistently, do the homework, and prepare seriously for tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesHigh EffortStrict AttendanceTest HeavyPolarizing Helpfulness
  • Many students and structured lectures.
  • , and test preparation.
  • Reviews are polarized, with some students calling her excellent and others finding her impatient or unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for prepared students, but , and strong test performance.

Online evidence mentions tough but rewarding work, while , and exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content , but calculus and precalculus move fast and .

Online reviews sound manageable, while and fast pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because students report pop quizzes, missed quizzes becoming zeros, and falling behind after absences.

, while online evidence only says students should use videos and office hours.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

She is recommended for disciplined students because her , but weaker math students may find her impatient and demanding.

Both formats include positive recommendations, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Students report clear criteria and some , but many also call her a .

Format shift

Online grading sounds somewhat supportive, while and few graded items.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Homework, practice, quizzes, and is not always graded.

Format shift

Online reviews describe normal to steady work, while and necessary.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and excellent at explaining math, though a sizable minority describe her as impatient or unhelpful.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and sometimes a small number of graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and written exams, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but often praise clear lectures while , and .

Main concern

her difficult and impatient.

What students said

“ good at Math.”
MATH180
“Do the quickly!”
MATH176
“ so if you're late/absent, you get a zero.”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are positive but still emphasize steady , and camera exams.

Main concern

Online students should expect weekly quizzes and a .

What students said

“Professor Working can be tough, but if you put in the work, her class is rewarding.”
MATH180
“ . made math fun for me.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard to difficult testing, with one online review explicitly mentioning camera exams and .

Camera ExamsWeekly QuizzesHard ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyPop Quizzes
“ .”
MATH180
“Get ready to study a lot because but mostly from the book.”
MATH280
“ so if you're late/absent, you get a zero.”
MATH176

Online

, and exams on camera, but does not clearly prove Lockdown Browser or open-book rules.

Camera ExamsWeekly QuizzesWritten Exams
“quizzes weekly.”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, pay attention, and do the an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

76/100

“ good at Math.”

Grade Effort

58/100

“You do need to work for your grade and spend time outside of class in order to pass or get a good grade.”

18/100

“ so if you're late/absent, you get a zero.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • good at Math.
  • .
  • She knows math well but doesn't like to teach it to the students.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • Do the quickly!
  • If you show up, pay attention, and do the an easy A.
  • .

Theme 3

Attendance and Participation

  • Don't miss any days, and .
  • She has very little patience for people who dont do the so dont expect if youre not putting in the work.
  • so if you're late/absent, you get a zero.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

190

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give rich, consistent evidence , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5132
4 out of 523
3 out of 513
2 out of 510
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH18016 reviews
MATH2809 reviews
MATH1108 reviews
MATH0904 reviews
MATH1763 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1802 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
MATH1701802 reviews
1101 review
79241 review
MATH1151 review
TRIG1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3