AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Erin Rocha

PSY150 · PSY138 · PSY120 · SOC138 · PSY1203988 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
82.61%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and weekly work usually lead to a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear CriteriaCaringReading HeavyFair GraderWell Organized
  • Students , and caring attitude.
  • The class is usually manageable if students keep up with , and quizzes.
  • Workload is steady rather than effortless, with several reviews mentioning lots of reading and regular quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A strong grade is very attainable if students keep up with straightforward weekly work and .

Online reviews make the easy-A path clearer, while but and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The and clearly structured, though the reading, writing, and .

Online reviews describe especially clear modules, while in-person reviews are slightly and lecture complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and in-class activities but do not consistently prove a .

Online attendance evidence is not relevant beyond deadlines, while in-person reviews imply participation .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

86/100

Students recommend her because , and .

Both online and especially strong for organization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students often , and high scores are achievable with completed work and effort.

Format shift

Online reviews more directly describe full points for completed work, while notes.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload is steady with reading, journals, discussions, quizzes, papers, and occasional exams, but most students find it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews describe predictable weekly modules, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and effective, despite a few complaints about boring lectures or .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize organization and responsiveness, while and activities.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and participation-style work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly quizzes, discussions, journals, and papers, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

lectures, activities, clear expectations, and fair grading, with some complaints about boredom or inconsistency.

Main concern

Reading and , and a few students found lectures boring.

What students said

“She clearly cares about students and if you put in the effort you will get a good grade.”
SOC138
“She lectures boring. I love social psychology but I get so bored in this class.”
PSY138

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a , quizzes, discussions, journals, and papers.

Main concern

Late work may not be accepted and weekly tasks require consistency.

What students said

“Her class is very easy to pass as long as you're responsible.”
PSY138
“The workload is fair, (journal, quiz, and .”
PSY150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm PaperFinal PapersExams MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, exams, a final, and a final paper, but .

QuizzesMidterm And FinalFinal PaperDrop Lowest Exam
“Midterm and the midterm to give yourself time).”
PSY150
“The class consisted of four exams and a . .”
PSY138

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, a , and preparation resources, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm PaperFinal PapersPreparation Resources
“Her class is well organized and consists of , and a journal.”
PSY138
“Gives preparation resources for midterm and final.”
PSY120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you follow the and keep up on work it is easy yet I still learned a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She clearly cares about students and if you put in the effort you will get a good grade.”

📋

86/100

“I thought she had a and I really appreciated it.”

📚 Workload Balance

60/100

“There is a lot of reading and writing work, but it's all straightforward.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Rocha is very caring and wants all her students to succeed.
  • She clearly cares about her students.
  • She was very slow with grading.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , as long as you put a little effort into your responses and meet the length requirements you should be good.
  • As long as you do everything that is asked you will get a good grade.
  • as long as you complete the work you're .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • A journal, discussion, and . Lots of reading.
  • The workload is fair, (journal, quiz, and .
  • All of the expectations are clearly laid out in the syllabus.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 23 detailed reviews across online and and mostly recent evidence.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY1389 reviews
PSY1205 reviews
PSY1505 reviews
SOC1383 reviews
PSY12039881 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1