AI Rate Professor

Business

Lynn McKinley

SOC120 · FS115 · FS7631 · FS110 · HUMAN125 · HUMANDEV · FS129 · FS3107 · FS120 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable with strict , and limited support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict graderHard examsHeavy writingRude feedbackMixed workload
  • Most reviews warn about strict grading, hard exams, unclear expectations, or rude communication.
  • Some students say the class is easy if you follow prompts, read, and participate consistently.
  • Online and frustration despite occasional positive experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earn A grades, but comments often , and long papers make the A require careful effort.

Online reviews include a few easy-course reports, while and grade risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content can be straightforward, but , and writing make it feel harder than the material itself.

Online students more often call the class itself easy, while and long papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but one review reports failing after missing one class over the limit.

Attendance penalties appear in in-person evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The low recommendation pattern comes from repeated complaints , and poor support.

, though online reviews have more recent mixed evidence with a few positive comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Many students describe tiny deductions, strict grading, no , and grades that feel unfair or hard to challenge.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly mention strict discussion and , while and attendance penalties.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload varies by course, but many reviews mention , and frequent exams.

Format shift

Online workload can be weekly and discussion-heavy, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students occasionally praise clarity, but many describe her as rude, unhelpful, inaccessible, sarcastic, or poorly aligned with exams.

Format shift

Online teaching complaints focus on email support and guidance, while , and classroom policies.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment includes papers, weekly assignments, discussion boards, reading, exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions, assignments, and exams, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and lots of work for average grades.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She gives you a 15 pg paper and a 10 pg paper.”
FS120
“After getting all A's on the tests and over the limit.”
FS110

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative, with several students calling the work easy while , and hard exams.

Main concern

and weak communication make online success feel risky.

What students said

“Class itself was easy, consisted of weekly assignments and discussions w/ exam every 3-4 weeks.”
FS129
“Any tiny mistake is a mark.”
FS129

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is risky because several students describe hard, short-timed, book-based, or .

Hard ExamsTimed Online ExamsFinal Based On BookEssay QuestionsNo Study Guide

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams not matching lectures, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsEssay QuestionsNo Study GuideTests Not Aligned With Lectures
“ in class”
FS110
“No Study Guide, 4 to 5 essay questions on exams.”
FS110

Online

Online reviews mention exams every few weeks, a , and timed online exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Exams Every 3-4 WeeksHard FinalBook-Based FinalTimed Online Exams
“She provides exams every 4 weeks which aren't bad at all.”
FS110
“Surprised on how hard the .”
FS110
“The .”
FS110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT risk taking this professor's class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and instructor support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“Any tiny mistake is a mark.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“This class started off good the ended with alot of work and frustration.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • She also isn't very accessible outside of class, so .
  • as to what she expects in the class and assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is super easy, I believe that the and helpful.
  • The and it makes it hard to get a good grade in the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Extremely condescending. She's borderline rude.
  • ....

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across both formats and many years provide strong evidence, with and support.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 512

Course coverage

FS11013 reviews
FS1208 reviews
FS1297 reviews
FS1152 reviews
FS31071 review
Show 4 more courses
FS76311 review
HUMAN1251 review
HUMANDEV1 review
SOC1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 2 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1