AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Danny Martinez

HIST199 · CCS119 · CSS114 · SOC114 · HIS119 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take him only if you can manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized online courseHeavy readingLots of writingGood feedbackSlow communication
  • Online courses , and quizzes.
  • Students split sharply between praise for feedback and , and .
  • In-person evidence is limited but also mixed, .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but comments show they came with , and self-management.

Online reviews show high workload despite some A grades, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content feels harder because readings, quizzes, films, papers, and .

Online comments provide most difficulty evidence; in-person comments are too few and mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews because most evidence is online coursework rather than meetings.

Online reviews focus on deadlines and assignments, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because disorganization, heavy workload, and poor communication outweigh praise for passion and feedback.

Online reviews are mostly negative or mixed, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students mention and slow grading, but , and passing if work is completed.

Format shift

Online reviews show fairness mixed with confusion, while hurt too much.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly readings, reports, discussion responses, film papers, essays, and .

Format shift

The heavy-workload signal is strongest in online reviews; in-person workload evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students praise his passion and feedback, but , and weak communication.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly about disorganized course structure, while and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment mixes papers, reports, discussions, film reviews, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly show mixed assignments and quizzes, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and mixed, with one strong complaint about access and one strong praise for feedback.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent accessibility and support.

What students said

“ and takes a .”
HIS119
“Danny gave me good and and is willing to work with his students.”
CSS114

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews dominate and and writing, mixed teaching quality, and frequent organization problems.

Main concern

The main concern is , and communication.

What students said

“There are typically 4 assignments each week.”
SOC114
“ .”
SOC114
“ and graded within a timely manner.”
HIS119

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

QuizzesFinalTest Heavy In Some SectionsStudy Guides Not Helpful

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and a final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

QuizzesFinalStudy Guides Not Helpful
“a ”
HIS119
“The .”
HIST199
“ .”
CCS119

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Legitimately has more work than my Gen Chem and Calc classes ever had.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Very passionate about this subject but lacks organization.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ unless you absolutely have no better options.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There are typically 4 assignments each week.
  • So !
  • Lots of writing.

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • Syllabus did not match due dates or assignments.
  • Lectures are all typed and were clearly not proofread or edited since the courses creation.
  • The as he does not update timely for each term.

Theme 3

💬

  • and graded within a timely manner.
  • Professor Martinez is very fair and .
  • and takes a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 14 reviews include detailed themes, but the and opinions are polarized.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

SOC1147 reviews
CCS1193 reviews
HIS1192 reviews
CSS1141 review
HIST1991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1