AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

James Wallerstedt

CS1S133 · CSIS133 · CSIS132 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
90.91%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you want a earns a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear gradingHelpful feedbackHands-on projectsOnline savvyNo textbook cost
  • Most students describe him as , and especially strong for online web development courses.
  • Grades are usually very achievable if , and .
  • A , and self-teaching expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A is very realistic with steady completion of projects, quizzes, and discussions, but it is not a pure free A.

Most evidence is online, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The courses are beginner-friendly and well explained, but coding concepts and CSIS133 projects can still be challenging.

Online reviews describe both clear support and some self-teaching, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

78/100

Reviews , and online work appears deadline-based with .

Online evidence suggests flexibility through extended deadlines, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and responsive.

Both formats are positive, with the strongest volume of recommendation evidence coming from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades are commonly , and several students mention fair grading or .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the main grading evidence, while .

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The workload is steady with projects, quizzes, discussions, and hands-on assignments, but students usually describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly work and projects most often, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe clear explanations, helpful feedback, real-world knowledge, and strong support despite a few harsh negative reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly excellent but include several complaints, while sample.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

, and some tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews describe quizzes, tests, and projects, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, free materials, communication, and confidence-building projects.

Main concern

The and long but informative online lectures.

What students said

“He teaches course material with deep passion, authority, and .”
CSIS133
“I struggled in the beginning.”
CSIS132

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive overall, with , and a few complaints about confusing directions.

Main concern

Some students felt the course relied too much on videos, YouTube, or self-guided research.

What students said

“Professor Wallerstedt made is and would help you if you emailed him.”
CSIS132
“This professor does not teach(literally).”
CSIS133

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests quizzes and , but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring details.

Ample Quiz TimeMultiple Attempts MentionedTest Heavy MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online

Online reviews mention tough quizzes, plenty of time, more than one attempt, and test-heavy structure, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Ample Quiz TimeMultiple Attempts MentionedTest Heavy MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Gives plenty of and ”
CS1S133
“for the and more than one time attempt”
CSIS132

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Wallerstedt .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He makes the concepts easy to grasp.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ .”

⚖️

82/100

“Do the work, get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the concepts easy to grasp.
  • His lectures are always relevant and .
  • He teaches course material with deep passion, authority, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the work, get a good grade.
  • The , but he give plenty of time to allow you to look up the answers.
  • Great class! It is challenging, but you will learn a lot.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • This professor does not teach(literally).
  • .
  • as clear.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 33 reviews across several years, mostly detailed and consistent, with a small number of strong dissenting opinions.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CSIS13221 reviews
CS1S1336 reviews
CSIS1336 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 11 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values