AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

James Hotz

CSIS293 · 324 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
99.39%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with deadlines.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsFair gradingSupportive feedbackOrganized online courseManageable coding work
  • Students consistently describe clear, patient teaching that makes programming easier to follow.
  • Grades are usually high, but deadlines, documentation, and coding details can be strict.
  • All analyzed reviews are online, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students earned A-range grades, but you still need to complete practical coding work carefully and on time.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Programming concepts can be challenging, but students say and makes the course manageable.

Online students repeatedly describe clear explanations, while there is .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation appears helpful, but reviews do .

Online reviews mention participation and following along, with no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and effective at teaching coding.

The recommendation evidence is entirely online because there are no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades are mostly high and as fair, though small coding mistakes, documentation, and late work can matter.

Format shift

Online reviews show fair but .

Workload

Light

78/100

Assignments are relevant and manageable, but students must keep up and follow coding expectations closely.

Format shift

Online workload is described as fair and manageable, with no in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, patience, organization, practical examples, and support.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention both coding assignments and fair exams, with assignments appearing central to the course.

Format shift

Online reviews discuss assignments and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with students , and helpful feedback.

Main concern

Late work, make-ups, documentation, and minor coding mistakes can be treated strictly.

What students said

“Easy-to-follow course. and helps everyone succeed. Great experience overall.”
CSIS293
“He can be a bit strict with deadlines, but he's a reasonable guy overall.”
CSIS293

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe predictable, fair exams focused on fundamentals, but .

Fair ExamsNo Trick QuestionsFundamental Concepts

Assessment risk

Standard

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and not based on trick questions, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Fair ExamsNo Trick QuestionsFundamental Concepts
“You always know what to expect in .”
CSIS293
“He isn't the type to give 'trick' questions, just expects you to know the fundamental concepts.”
CSIS293

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was a highlight of my semester. The professor connects well with , and uses real-world examples.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Professor makes complex material understandable. Challenging but rewarding class with and strong support.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ .”

⚖️

82/100

“Assignments and , and he's approachable and helpful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and ensures everyone follows.
  • Professor .
  • He uses real-world analogies that make sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not a 'blow-off' class, but definitely manageable.
  • , and I got dinged for minor mistakes in coding assignments.
  • He can be a bit strict with deadlines, but he's a reasonable guy overall.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Coding Work

  • Office hours were super useful for debugging questions.
  • Good teacher, but his powerpoints are basically just snippets of code.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

324

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 recent online reviews are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5323
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSIS29350 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

45

A+ 8 · A 32 · A- 5

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values