AI Rate Professor

Education

Tarah Roberti

CD210 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take this professor if you want a useful online course with strong lectures and manageable work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat Online LecturesHelpful ResourcesPractical CourseExtra CreditRecommended
  • The only review is extremely positive and reports an A.
  • The online lectures and resources were described as useful and practical.
  • Workload was manageable, with not many papers and available.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A looks very reachable because the and .

All evidence comes from the single online review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course was useful and manageable, though the topic still required real engagement.

All course easiness evidence comes from the online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

The review , so flexibility cannot be proven.

Only online evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

The student strongly recommends the professor because the lectures and resources were helpful.

The recommendation evidence is entirely online, with no in-person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

The A grade, tag, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

The student says there were not many papers and describes the workload as manageable.

Format shift

Only the online review describes workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

The student says the online lectures were great and the course was very helpful.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is online only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review mentions papers and online resources but .

Format shift

and resources, with no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises helpful lectures, useful resources, manageable writing, and a practical learning experience.

Main concern

The only limitation is that the evidence comes from one review.

What students said

“There were not a ton of papers, but the professor provided a lot of on-line resources that you can use.”
CD210
“her on-line lectures were great.”
CD210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam policy unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would recommend this professor and if I can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“her on-line lectures were great.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“I would recommend this professor and if I can.”

📚 Workload Balance

78/100

“There were not a ton of papers, but the professor provided a lot of on-line resources that you can use.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her on-line lectures were great.
  • I took CD 210, Challenging Behaviors, and it was extremely helpful for me with behaviors in my classroom.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There were not a ton of papers, but the professor provided a lot of on-line resources that you can use.
  • I would recommend this professor and if I can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

The review is recent and detailed, but one review is too small for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values