AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Waller

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Take John Waller if you want a supportive professor and are ready for a demanding workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring ProfessorDemanding CourseLots of HomeworkFunny And HelpfulWorth The Effort
  • Students strongly praise his personality, support, and teaching despite high difficulty.
  • The course can be very demanding, especially with lots of homework.
  • and are willing to work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but the comments and persistence rather than minimal effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is intellectually demanding, especially in the 6 week summer format.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they describe the course as demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and makes a hard course feel worthwhile.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

because students earned strong grades but still describe the course as demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention grading-related experience, with no online evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because a student explicitly warns about lots of homework and a demanding course.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as kind, caring, funny, helpful, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The comments emphasize homework and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as funny, caring, and helpful, but the course can be highly demanding with lots of homework.

Main concern

Expect and real course difficulty.

What students said

“one of the most demanding courses I've taken but !”
160
“Be prepared for lots of homework”
160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kind, caring, and funny. Wants to see his students succeed and will help you get there.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Kind, caring, and funny. Wants to see his students succeed and will help you get there.”

📚 Workload Demand

25/100

“Be prepared for lots of homework”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny dude
  • Kind, caring, and funny.
  • he will go over any question you have and walk you through it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • one of the most demanding courses I've taken but !
  • Be prepared for lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Wants to see his students succeed and will help you get there.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the two reviews are recent and consistent, but the sample size is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1251 review
1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values