AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jennifer Vanden-Eynden

MATH299A · MATH280 · MATH285 · MATH170 · MATH1803504 · MATH180 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want strong teaching and are willing to practice consistently for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplainerTough GraderExam HeavyHelpful Office HoursCaring
  • , and office-hour help.
  • The main cost is a and limited extra cushioning.
  • , so steady practice usually pays off.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with consistent homework practice, but and .

Online evidence is harsher about exam difficulty, while well.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is challenging, but and review materials make it manageable.

Online reviews describe tougher exam pressure, while makes exams manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation and , but at least one in-person review says participation .

Online reviews include stronger warnings about needing class, while and sometimes important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes hard math feel workable.

, while online reviews are mixed because one student found the exams much harder.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students often call her a tough or , but several say expectations and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize no and , while in-person reviews emphasize tough but predictable grading.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Homework and practice are substantial, but students often frame the workload as useful preparation rather than pointless volume.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy exam preparation, with than the exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most comments praise , and caring approach.

Format shift

In-person reviews are consistently strong, while online reviews include one very positive and one negative experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly say exams make up a major share of the grade, with homework and quizzes serving mainly as preparation.

Format shift

, and online reviews explicitly cite exams worth 45 percent.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and support despite tough grading.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Genuinely hate how well she taught because it raised my bar of expectations for my future classes.”
MATH280
“She appreciates class participation, but .”
MATH280

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and a harsher experience with difficult exams and no .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and .”
MATH280
“The and lectures.”
MATH1803504

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Exam HeavyReview SheetsHomework Harder Than ExamsTake-Home Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, easier exams than homework in several cases, and take-home quizzes in older courses.

Exam HeavyGood Review SheetsTake-Home Quizzes
“ but she gives a good review sheet for ”
MATH280
“ , and reasonable amount of HW.”
MATH170

Online

Online reviews say there are three exams worth 45 percent and disagree on whether exams are harder than homework, with .

Three Exams45 Percent Exam WeightNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There are three exams that are worth 45 percent of grade”
MATH280
“The exams are worth 45 percent of your grade.”
MATH1803504

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely hate how well she taught because it raised my bar of expectations for my future classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Jenny is an amazing professor and a great teacher.”

⚖️

48/100

“Definitely a , but ”

🧪

58/100

“ but she gives a good review sheet for ”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's good at explaining problems, so go to office hours!!!
  • Her .
  • Shows you many tricks to memorize the different formulas

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The material can be challenging but she does a great job of helping you through it.
  • The and lectures.
  • practice

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She never leaves you with more questions than you started.
  • Will be willing to answer of your questions and .
  • Overall amazing professor and person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of excellent teaching with .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2805 reviews
MATH1701 review
MATH1801 review
MATH18035041 review
MATH2851 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH299A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1