AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Julie Hansen

CSIS110 · BUS120 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are and ask for help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when engagedHeavy homeworkMixed communicationFast-paced lecturesParticipation matters
  • Students , and willingness to help when they ask.
  • Workload , and projects.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because due dates, guidance, and communication are frequent concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are common, but students , and participation require steady effort.

Online reviews stress workload and due-date issues, while if you participate.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

She can make hard material understandable, but fast pacing and easy.

In-person students describe clearer lectures, while online students report more confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation helps grades and learning, but .

and participating; online reviews emphasize communication and assignment tracking.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and energy, but communication problems prevent a stronger endorsement.

, while online reviews are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and flexibility on late work help, but and participation still matter.

Format shift

Online reviews mention flexibility on missing work, while and participation.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and projects.

Format shift

Online reviews sound heavier, while homework.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

She is often described as helpful, energetic, and clear, but some students report poor guidance and slow responses.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are stronger, while online reviews are divided.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and participation.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention quizzes, tests, and projects, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students are more positive about her energy and clarity, while .

Main concern

Students need to keep up with homework and participate to do well.

What students said

“ IS THE BEST”
CSIS110
“ .”
BUS120
“Miscommunication is a big issue.”
BUS120

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report helpful responsiveness in some sections but also heavy workload and .

Main concern

Miscommunication and heavy online assignments can make the class frustrating.

What students said

“Not a class you can just breeze through.”
CSIS110
“ .”
CSIS110
“Class heavily used an online textbook system that , and projects.”
CSIS110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention online quizzes, tests, and projects, but do .

Online Quizzes And TestsProjectsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Online

Online reviews mention textbook-system quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Online Quizzes And TestsProjectsTest Heavy
“online textbook system that , and projects.”
CSIS110
“Test heavy”
CSIS110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of work that needs to be done but she makes it relatable and she makes hard stuff easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“she makes hard stuff easy to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Not a class you can just breeze through.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

64/100

“Would love to have her again for a future class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gave complex and .
  • she makes hard stuff easy to understand.
  • She is fun and energetic when she lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • There's one big group project throughout the semester that .
  • There is a lot of .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • .
  • Miscommunication and no .
  • Miscommunication is a big issue.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and in-person formats show detailed, recurring patterns about workload, communication, and teaching.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CSIS1107 reviews
BUS1204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values