AI Rate Professor

Theater

Walter Bennett

THTR110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an easy and light theater class, but if organization matters to you.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFunny and Caring In PersonEasy ADisorganized OnlineMandatory AttendanceLight In-Person Work
  • In-person students describe him as funny, caring, and very easy for grades.
  • The online accelerated review is strongly negative because grades, modules, and instructions were poorly managed.
  • , but enforcement appears inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

In person, students call it an easy A with light work, but the online review adds uncertainty because .

The easy A evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course content appears light and accessible, though online organization made the accelerated version harder to manage.

In-person comments describe easy work, while the online comment describes workload timing and organization problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, though he often forgets to take it.

Attendance evidence appears only in in-person reviews; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and personality, but the online experience is described as highly disorganized.

, while the single online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and easy, but online grading transparency was poor.

Format shift

; online evidence says grades were not posted.

Workload

Light

72/100

In-person work is described as easy and not heavy, but the online accelerated course had many modules released late.

Format shift

In-person workload looks light, while the online workload was poorly timed and stressful.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is engaging and , but online teaching and organization were criticized sharply.

Format shift

In-person teaching is mostly praised, while online teaching is described as relying on outside videos and poor communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention assignments, a midterm, and a final, but .

Format shift

The , and a final; in-person reviews give little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly positive and , and an easy A.

Main concern

Lectures can become unfocused and feel like wasted time.

What students said

“The work was easy and wasn't that heavy.”
THTR-110
“It is an easy A, don't get me wrong, but SUCH a waste of my time.”
THTR-110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes serious disorganization, late module releases, missing grades, and weak teaching materials.

Main concern

Grades, modules, and instructions were not managed reliably.

What students said

“He NEVER posted grades for ANY assignments.”
THTR-110
“In the accelerated course, days before the final, he unlocked 5 modules to complete with just days before grades were due.”
THTR-110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final online, but do not clearly .

Midterm MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

The online review mentions a midterm and final but does not .

Midterm MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“He didn't even post the grades after the .”
THTR-110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is an easy A, don't get me wrong, but SUCH a waste of my time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching, workload, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“This professor was amazing.”

📉 Online Organization

30/100

“He NEVER posted grades for ANY assignments.”

📈 Grade Ease

84/100

“It is an easy A, don't get me wrong, but SUCH a waste of my time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing!! I had a fun time in this class.
  • He was also very hilarious and very caring.
  • Hes old, and often he stares off into space and forgets what he is doing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work was easy and wasn't that heavy.
  • It is an easy A, don't get me wrong, but SUCH a waste of my time.
  • He NEVER posted grades for ANY assignments.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Syllabus was contradictory.
  • He used another professors videos and youtube videos to "teach".
  • In the accelerated course, days before the final, he unlocked 5 modules to complete with just days before grades were due.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, and format opinions conflict sharply, but the comments are recent and specific.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

THTR-1104 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1